On 29/01/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Petar Tahchiev wrote: > Hi gyus, > > So to summon up the situation is this:I understand that there is still lots > of work to be done, but I definitely think that we are on the right way. > If any of the cactus-committers is able to look at the source tree in [2] > and give his feedback if it is good > enough to port it (maybe as a branch at first) on the cactus official repo. > So we can all continue working on it. Also it would be good > to hear from you, what else could be done for the successful release of the > of Cactus-1.8 project - this project definitely deserves our > joint efforts for bringing it to life again. I am in favor of moving things back to Apache, too bad the refactor wasn't done here to begin with though. The consequence of this is, that the changes need to come through the incubator. Which means : - A code grant for the code to be moved here. - Gettings CLA's on file - Start a vote to accept the code. - Start a vote to get Petar on board as a committer. The first 3 is to make sure that everything is covered legally. Mvgr, Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin hello, Yes it would be nice to bring the code back in the apache organization, but I am totally unaware what is expected of me. I mean if there is anything I have to do for the code to be brought back in the official repository, please let me know. -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria.
