On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Martin Bochnig <martin at martux.org> wrote:
> I also have another idea: Printing.
>
> Presto does a great job etc.
> And we have the Java based /usr/sbin/printmgr LP printmgr GUI for
> Solaris LP as well as the new gtk based CUPS config utility.
> But the latter lacks much of the customizability that you would get
> via http://localhost:631 .
> For US-Letter this may not be problematic. But Europeans use A4. In
> case of a mismatch the printer's LCD prints the error message "Insert
> US-Letter paper" and waits forever. Previously you could specify the
> paper size on a per-print-job-basis when printing from Desktop apps
> like Mozilla/FF. Now not anymore. I doubt many average Desktop users
> know about http://localhost:631 (and by the way, on my box I cannot
> even reach it despite docs recommending this, such as the OS Bible, I
> just found that not daemon or SMF service matching the substring
> "cups" is running, what is going on?).


Oh, I was wrong. But I have been as a consequence of confusing Gnome
menu entries:

Administration-->[Print Manager]
/usr/bin/ospm-pm

plus

Administration-->[Solaris LP Print Manager]
/usr/sbin/printmgr

While I had *thought* if the first configures SVR4 LP, then the second
probably configures CUPS, this has been a mis-assumption. I see that
the one is in sbin while ther other is in bin. So they are both for
Solaris LP at different administrative levels, like from Solaris 8 on?
With that one in bin having been replaced with a non-Java version?

You know, I don't like paper. I prefer on-screen PDF.
I set up my LaserJet 5N for the first time in 2 years.

Whatever: Are there plans to add CUPS's http://localhost:631 to the
Gnome Start Menu, or has it already been done?

Right now I'm using the SXCE snv_114 Laptop and don't want to start
the other Laptop or VirtualBox for verification ...


%martin

> Here now my suggestion, if it hasn't already been proposed or done earlier:
> Some pointer to http://localhost:631 should make it into the
> Gnome_Menu. Except some reason I'm overlooking speaks against it. Just
> a suggestion I wanted to bring up for somebody to consider. Maybe this
> should be asked on desktop-discuss or over at presto?
>
>
> %martin
>

Reply via email to