Dave Miner wrote: > Frank Ludolph wrote: >> >> >> Jedy Wang wrote: >>> The withdraw is temporary which means it will not be committed into >>> May release. If the patch is reviewed, I will committed the patch >>> after May release. >> I agree that 1075 isn't critical for May, but I think this one should >> go in. It is very disorienting when the user magnifies the map and >> suddenly is somewhere very different. Virtually every user will >> experience this disorientation. >> > > As the rules I sent out yesterday said, you can nominate a bug you > think is a blocker, and we'll discuss it. I'm certainly sympathetic > to the issue here. > > Relatedly, I'm still seeing the timezone screen end up with a vertical > scroll bar in the test images even after the recent changes. So I > think we're going to need to make some fixes here anyway; if this > one's low risk I'd likely take it, too. > Correct. We're runnning out of vertical space. We can claw a bit more space by repositioning the time setting to be beside the date setting rather than below. It might just be enough. We may also need to consider making the default zoomed out initial map size a bit smaller, or to crop the map image when it's zoomed out, like it does for the zoomed in view. Making the map smaller would allow more room for padding around the opensolaris logo also.
Frank: Which approach do you prefer? Jedy: Do you think either fix is risky or complicated to do? Thanks, Niall. > Dave >
