Sarah Jelinek wrote: > Dave Miner wrote: >> Joseph J. VLcek wrote: >>> jan damborsky wrote: >>>> Hi Joe, >>>> >>>> >>>> On 04/14/09 13:39, Joseph J. VLcek wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I am POC this week. >>>>> >>>>> I just added 2 new bugs to the 2009.1H stopper list. >>>>> >>>>> 8115 came in listed as P3/enhancement but should be investigated. >>>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=8115 >>>> >>>> Looking at this issue, it seems that it occurs in scenario >>>> when ISC DHCP server is used instead of Sun DHCP server. >>>> >>>> I think that in order to determine if 8115 is stopper for >>>> 2009.06, we might need to clarify if/how that scenario is >>>> supported for 2009.06 release. >>>> >>>> As support for ISC DHCP is not on the task list for 2009.06 >>>> and installadm(1M) tools don't cope with ISC DHCP server >>>> yet, I think that these bugs/enhancements are not stoppers. >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> Jan >>>> >>> Thank you Jan. >>> >>> I set this as a stopper to be on the safe side. Let's plan to discuss >>> it in bug court today. >>> >>> I agree, the question we need to answer regarding 8115 is if we fully >>> support ISC DHCP for 2009.06. >>> >> >> No discussion is necessary. The requested change is in code in ON, >> and would not be approved for a respin given that there is a trivial >> workaround in the ISC server, which is a secondarily supported server, >> not the primary one, as Jan noted. Ergo, not a blocker. > Hi Dave, > > What is the bug id of the ON changes? I just want to understand the issue. >
There isn't one, but that's where this would need to go (either there or in the OBP - not clear to me exactly). We don't have any control over the requested options in our code. Dave
