Dave Miner wrote: > Sarah Jelinek wrote: >> Dave Miner wrote: >>> Joseph J. VLcek wrote: >>>> jan damborsky wrote: >>>>> Hi Joe, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 04/14/09 13:39, Joseph J. VLcek wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am POC this week. >>>>>> >>>>>> I just added 2 new bugs to the 2009.1H stopper list. >>>>>> >>>>>> 8115 came in listed as P3/enhancement but should be investigated. >>>>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=8115 >>>>> >>>>> Looking at this issue, it seems that it occurs in scenario >>>>> when ISC DHCP server is used instead of Sun DHCP server. >>>>> >>>>> I think that in order to determine if 8115 is stopper for >>>>> 2009.06, we might need to clarify if/how that scenario is >>>>> supported for 2009.06 release. >>>>> >>>>> As support for ISC DHCP is not on the task list for 2009.06 >>>>> and installadm(1M) tools don't cope with ISC DHCP server >>>>> yet, I think that these bugs/enhancements are not stoppers. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>> Thank you Jan. >>>> >>>> I set this as a stopper to be on the safe side. Let's plan to >>>> discuss it in bug court today. >>>> >>>> I agree, the question we need to answer regarding 8115 is if we >>>> fully support ISC DHCP for 2009.06. >>>> >>> >>> No discussion is necessary. The requested change is in code in ON, >>> and would not be approved for a respin given that there is a trivial >>> workaround in the ISC server, which is a secondarily supported >>> server, not the primary one, as Jan noted. Ergo, not a blocker. >> Hi Dave, >> >> What is the bug id of the ON changes? I just want to understand the >> issue. >> > > There isn't one, but that's where this would need to go (either there or > in the OBP - not clear to me exactly). We don't have any control over > the requested options in our code. >
Or, as I should have mentioned, we change to not using that option, which needs evaluation. Dave
