Ethan Quach wrote: > > > Sarah Jelinek wrote: >> Dave Miner wrote: >>> Sarah Jelinek wrote: >>>> Dave Miner wrote: >>>>> Joseph J. VLcek wrote: >>>>>> jan damborsky wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Joe, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 04/14/09 13:39, Joseph J. VLcek wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am POC this week. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just added 2 new bugs to the 2009.1H stopper list. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 8115 came in listed as P3/enhancement but should be investigated. >>>>>>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=8115 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looking at this issue, it seems that it occurs in scenario >>>>>>> when ISC DHCP server is used instead of Sun DHCP server. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think that in order to determine if 8115 is stopper for >>>>>>> 2009.06, we might need to clarify if/how that scenario is >>>>>>> supported for 2009.06 release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As support for ISC DHCP is not on the task list for 2009.06 >>>>>>> and installadm(1M) tools don't cope with ISC DHCP server >>>>>>> yet, I think that these bugs/enhancements are not stoppers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you Jan. >>>>>> >>>>>> I set this as a stopper to be on the safe side. Let's plan to >>>>>> discuss it in bug court today. >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree, the question we need to answer regarding 8115 is if we >>>>>> fully support ISC DHCP for 2009.06. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No discussion is necessary. The requested change is in code in ON, >>>>> and would not be approved for a respin given that there is a >>>>> trivial workaround in the ISC server, which is a secondarily >>>>> supported server, not the primary one, as Jan noted. Ergo, not a >>>>> blocker. >>>> Hi Dave, >>>> >>>> What is the bug id of the ON changes? I just want to understand the >>>> issue. >>>> >>> >>> There isn't one, but that's where this would need to go (either there >>> or in the OBP - not clear to me exactly). We don't have any control >>> over the requested options in our code. >> Ah ok.. I misunderstood. I thought you meant the changes were "in", >> meaning they were delivered. thanks. > > Sundar had noted that the fix for 6820873 would make it possible for the > install program to get this value from wanboot since it apparently does > request > root-path from the ISC server. >
If they are retrievable from wanboot.conf, then you don't need them in DHCP. That's the essence of that bug report. > Can someone explain what the workaround is, or just add it to the bug > report. I sped read through it so may have missed it if its already there. > The description has it vaguely, use dhcp-parameter-request-list in dhcpd.conf. I don't have a specific example to supply. Dave
