Thanks, Jan, looks good now.

Sue

On 04/22/09 06:44, jan damborsky wrote:
> Hi Sue,
> 
> thank you very much for your comments.
> Please see my response in-line.
> The webrev has been updated accordingly.
> 
> Jan
> 
> 
> 
> On 04/22/09 15:29, Susan Sohn wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> Just some minor comments on the updated webrev:
>>
>> setup-sparc
>> -----------
>> 92 (nit)
>> referred -> referenced
>> or you could also use
>> referred -> pointed to
> 
> Changed.
> 
>>
>> 240-245 Perhaps change the wording of:
>>
>> "Service $srv_dfl is currently used by SPARC" \
>>      "clients not explicitly associated with another" \
>>      "service by the use of the 'create-client' subcommand"
>>
>> to
>>
>> "Service $srv_dfl is currently being used by SPARC" \
>>      "clients which have not explicitly been associated with another" \
>>      "service via the 'create-client' subcommand."
> 
> Changed.
> 
>>
>> and (nit) add a comma after clients in:
>>
>> "To select service $svc_name for those SPARC clients" \
>>                       "use the following commands:"
> 
> Changed.
> 
>>
>>
>> setup-service
>> -------------
>> 259,268,273 Sparc-> SPARC
> 
> Changed.
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sue
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/21/09 04:39, jan damborsky wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> could I please ask two people for reviewing changes for following 
>>> blocker ?
>>>
>>> 8262 'installadm create-service' shouldn't overwrite 
>>> /etc/netboot/wanboot.conf for Sparc, but notify user instead
>>>
>>> webrev:
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~dambi/bug-8262
>>>
>>> Thank you very much,
>>> Jan
>>>
>>>
>>> modules affected:
>>> -----------------
>>> * installadm tools (Sparc platform)
>>>
>>> testing done -  please see attached test procedures
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>
> 


Reply via email to