On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Matt Keenan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Apologies,
>
> Forgot to add external link :
>
> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/download/Project+caiman/auto_install/ai-multi-design-0.1.pdf

For data pools, you say you don't support cache/log/spare devices. I see
this as a significant omission and an inconsistency. I can see a reasonable
limitation being that you only support 1- to N-way mirrored root pools; if
you're going to support data pools at all then allowing cache/log/spare devices
seems essential. (And not terribly difficult.) Besides, I expect such pool
configurations to be very common.

There's an example in 3.2.4.1:

zpool create mypool mirror d1 d2 raidz d3 d4 d5 d6

seriously, I hope this would be rejected!

There's also

mirror c0t0d0 c0t1d0 c0t2d0

it may be a minor thing, but I immediately think of a root pool when
given those devices, and that example then suggests that I can use EFI
labelled disks rathe than SMI partitions.

Appendix 1:

default name is rpool - does this mean the name of the root pool
can be changed? Is the default name of a data pool still rpool?

Comment above "zpool_file_system_properties" - is that zpool
create or zfs create? And -O or -o? (It's not immediately obvious
why there are two sets of property settings here, when dataset
properties can also be specified later on.)

"Pool type, concatenated or mirror. Default if
this element is specified is concatenation."

Missing not? And the list is longer than just concatenated or mirror.

Target devices - does this mean that if you just tell it to create a
raidz, without listing devices, then it will just pick some at random?
That seems horribly broken - I would expect that to just fail with
an error. If you want auto-selection, then I would prefer to say
so explicitly.

Thanks,

-- 
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to