On 08/11/10 01:30, Sarah Jelinek wrote:
software.dtd:
55: im_type - for curiosity's sake, is there a reason this isn't
"img_type"?
No, no reason. I could change this. Dermot, if I make this change does
it mean we have to change anything in the AI client code? We don't use
this for these changes do we?
This element is not currently used anywhere , so you can safely change
it now without anything in the client code needing to be changed.
btw, in the software.dtd comments, can you change:
<full>
</full>
to
<full/>
as this is declared as a EMPTY element.
Actually, the three EMPTY sub-elements of im_type look like
they might work better as attributes, instead, unless there's a reason
to have them as elements (such as future use)? eg, change:
<!ELEMENT im_type ((full|partial), zone?)>
<!ELEMENT full EMPTY>
<!ELEMENT partial EMPTY>
<!ELEMENT zone EMPTY>
...
<im_type>
<full/>
</im_type>
to
<!ELEMENT im_type EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST im_type completeness (full|partial) #REQUIRED>
<!ATTLIST im_type zone (true|false) "false">
...
<im_type completeness="partial" zone="false"/>
- Dermot
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
