On 09/10/10 09:15 AM, Jan Damborsky wrote:
  On 09/10/10 10:00 AM, Frank Allan wrote:
Thanks Jan

I guess I am just getting old and missing small (but vital) details. :-[

Maybe we should consider putting slightly different thing in that sample
manfiest :-)
For instance 'xxx/v4' instead of 'net0/v4'. That might have it more
obvious that this
is parameter which is also expected to be modified.


Well, for now it might be mildly helpful, but once vanity-naming-by-default happens, that example would, I believe, work out of the box. Perhaps just a comment in the example would be sufficient?

Dave
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to