On 09/10/10 10:32 AM, Jan Damborsky wrote:
On 09/10/10 04:21 PM, Dave Miner wrote:
On 09/10/10 09:15 AM, Jan Damborsky wrote:
On 09/10/10 10:00 AM, Frank Allan wrote:
Thanks Jan
I guess I am just getting old and missing small (but vital) details.
:-[
Maybe we should consider putting slightly different thing in that sample
manfiest :-)
For instance 'xxx/v4' instead of 'net0/v4'. That might have it more
obvious that this
is parameter which is also expected to be modified.
Well, for now it might be mildly helpful, but once
vanity-naming-by-default happens, that example would, I believe, work
out of the box.
This is a good point.
Perhaps just a comment in the example would be sufficient?
I agree. We plan to introduce comment sections in SC default manifest
and templates in similar way we currently do in other manifests.
We can't do this right now, since when embedded within AI manifest, SC
manifest
is put there as XML comment and XML does not cope with nested comments.
Yes :-) However, since static_network.xml is set up as a separate
document that has to be edited in, it seems we could add the comment and
say that as well. I'd think it would fail validation on add if the
comment wasn't edited out, wouldn't it?
Dave
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
