John,

A couple of replies in-line ...


On 01/04/11 10:43, John Fischer wrote:
 Ethan and Sue,

Thanks, great feedback.  I appreciate the help.

In addition to your comments I have updated the copyright dates
for all files concerned.  See below.

I'll produce an updated webrev shortly.  I am waiting on the ON
gatekeepers to be sure that I get the copyright changes correct.
Once that happens I'll provide a new webrev along with a differential
webrev.

Thanks,

John

On 01/ 3/11 08:24 PM, Ethan Quach wrote:

installadm.c
---------------
1408 - Can you elaborate on this comment? It seems like the code is figuring out whether or not we're dealing with a new service or an old one and setting path accordingly, not 'ensuring' that we're dealing with a new one.

Replaced:

        /*
         * Ensure we're dealing with a new service setup
         */

With:

        /*
         * The new server setup is located at var/ai/.  The new
         * service setup adds the service name to the end of this
         * path.  First, create a path assuming that we are dealing
         * with a new service setup.  Then ensure that this path
         * exists and use it if it does.  Otherwise, default to
         * an older service setup that uses the port instead of
         * the service name.
         */

var/ai -> /var/ai

setup-service.sh
---------------------
185-189 - If this function is used for when creating a new service, when would $VARAI/$port already exist?

Right. There is no reason. If it exists then that would be a problem. I have added
an else clause to the if statement which returns -1 (i.e., error).

What I meant was, if we're creating an install service, why do we need to check for and create /var/ai/<port> at all in the new code? With this new webserver code, creation of services (even for older builds) should set things up for the service in /var/ai/<svcname> no matter what right?


-ethan


_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to