Hi John,
I don't see a matter of diluting the energy among several projects... But people that does not feel comfortable with restrictive licences (or restrictive behaviour of companies that hold their particular licences, which is my case) might want help only the free initiatives. Perhaps it is not open to discussion within Cake Core Team, but surely you guys should consider the idea of releasing the documentation with a licence that do not give people the fright I had, so as to allow them to modify and to host (taking the responsabilities for it, of course) with the modifications. Anyway, I repeat. I don't think starting a third and new documentation effort is the solution. Let us not fork. Dérico On Jun 19, 4:45 pm, "John David Anderson (_psychic_)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 19, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Jonathan Langevin wrote: > > > I agree a central location would be best, but to also avoid any > > legal issues, is why I suggested a 3rd party GPL effort > > How many third-party efforts would you suggest? :) > > I still don't see how diluting the effort in many parallel projects > helps anyone. > > -- John > > > > > > > On 6/19/07, John David Anderson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jun 19, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Dérico Filho wrote: > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > I am not sure... But I think the CakePHP Manual and CakePHP logo are > > > intellectual property of Cake Software Foundation, which is the > > back- > > > company of CakePHP. > > > CakePHP is MIT Licensed, however that's not the case of their > > > documentation and logo... > > > > But that's OK, mr. Woodworth told me they are going to make a > > similar > > > application soon... Thus we'll be very well served. > > > Rights and junk aside - its really better we have a central clearing > > house for cakephp-related information. If we have a bunch of side > > efforts, its harder to get anything of consequence done, much less > > get everyone to it. > > > If you've got some great ideas for how to improve cakephp please come > > and contact us! If we can coordinate efforts, that will streamline > > the way information is disseminated, and avoid duplicate efforts. > > > -- John > > > > Dérico > > > > On Jun 19, 12:43 pm, "Jonathan Langevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> How was the intellectual property misused? Not arguing or > > >> doubting, just > > >> wondering > > > >> On 6/19/07, Dérico Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> Hi, everyone! > > > >>> I've been contacted by Mr. Woodworth, President for Cake Software > > >>> Foundation. > > > >>> I seems I misused Cake's Intellectual Property. I play by the > > rules, > > >>> and therefore, I had to shutdown the free-to-comment version of > > the > > >>> manual. > > > >>> I managed to talk to Mr. Woodworth and we are on talks to see > > >>> whether > > >>> this initiative might be used for benefit for Cake Software > > >>> Foundation > > >>> and its community of developers. > > > >>> Until then, I can only add I am sorry. > > > >>> Dérico Filho > > > >>> On Jun 18, 1:32 pm, Dérico Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>> Also... the comment area was too short in the database... Just > > >>>> changed > > >>>> it to store longer texts. > > > >>>> On 18 jun, 13:07, "Sonic Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>>>> Out with ya! > > > >>>>> Sonic- Hide quoted text - > > > >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
