Gonzalo: I'm not suggesting that anyone *wants* CakePHP to collapse.
This public argument amongst the core devs doesn't bode well for the
health of the project, regardless of what anyone--including
them--wants.

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Gonzalo Servat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:37 PM, b logica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > ruh-roh! No, this doesn't bode well at all. Dudes, I hope this gets
> > sorted out. It'd be a shame for this project to collapse. I think
> > p14r put it best: "[Uh oh. I see another Joomla brewing here. ]".
> >
> > Suggestion: take this off IRC. It's a terrible mode of communication
> > WRT arguments (though it can certainly be entertaining).
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> If you read what nate, gwoo, et al have been saying in regards to this
> topic, you'll find the project is not about to collapse. In fact, the
> conflict started because they want to make CakePHP even better and get
> releases out quicker. It's simply a matter of them coming to an agreement
> with the lead developer (PhpNut).
>
> - Gonzalo
>
>
>
>  >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to