Thanks Michael, FYI, I ran the ant script locally and it looked ok. It updated VERSION and Device.java which is what I would expect. I did not push the changes or tag since you are going to do it.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Michael Brooks <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks a lot Drew, > > I'll tag this release (and accept blame if I mess it up again). I just > want to make sure that the the ANT script does the job correctly. > > Michael > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Drew Walters <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Excellent, thanks Michael. I hadn't noticed that in the README before. >> I've pushed all the changes I need to make so BlackBerry is ready to be >> tagged. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Michael Brooks >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi Drew, >>> >>> This was a mistake on my side. We were rushing the release and I didn't >>> update phonegap-blackberry-webworks properly. >>> >>> I've documented how to do a proper release in the README and automated >>> it with an ANT command. >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> On Monday, 31 October, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Drew Walters wrote: >>> >>> I noticed the previous BlackBerry move from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 only updated >>> the VERSION file: >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/callback/callback-blackberry/commit/8caf6193b2b4ed9b59e6bce6eca79777e8582d21 >>> >>> whereas previously we were updating Device.java, library.xml and >>> config.xml: >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap-blackberry-webworks/commit/f42a61c2d1884b45fe00eb754e2657b20b3ed272 >>> >>> Was this intentional or were some changes missed? I could understand >>> not updating library.xml and config.xml because it minimizes impact to >>> application developers but Device.java should be updated with proper >>> version. >>> >>> Thoughts? I can make changes if responses are quick otherwise I will be >>> passing out candy :-) >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> If everyone is ready, I was hoping you guys could tag your repos 1.2.0. >>> I can package it up and ship it today. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -Steve >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > I think Brian is referring to a phonegap release from Nitobi, not a >>> Callback release from the Incubator. Sort of "flush the queue" kind of >>> stuff before starting to work 100% within the ASF. Is that the case? >>> >>> precisely so >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -Steve Gill >>> Nitobi Software >>> www.nitobi.com >>> http://twitter.com/#!/stevesgill >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
