Tagged callback-docs

On Monday, 31 October, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Filip Maj wrote:

+1 updating Device.java at the least.

We probably should update the others… do we have documentation in place
that details the upgrade process? If we update the versions of the
<feature> elements et al then developers will need to update their config
xmls each time as well….

From: Drew Walters
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>
>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<
mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>" <
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>
>>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:25:17 -0700
To: 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>
>>
Cc: "[email protected]<
mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>
>>
Subject: Re: [phonegap-dev] Re: PhoneGap 1.2.x

I noticed the previous BlackBerry move from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 only updated the
VERSION file:

https://github.com/callback/callback-blackberry/commit/8caf6193b2b4ed9b59e6bce6eca79777e8582d21

whereas previously we were updating Device.java, library.xml and config.xml:

https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap-blackberry-webworks/commit/f42a61c2d1884b45fe00eb754e2657b20b3ed272

Was this intentional or were some changes missed? I could understand not
updating library.xml and config.xml because it minimizes impact to
application developers but Device.java should be updated with proper
version.

Thoughts? I can make changes if responses are quick otherwise I will be
passing out candy :-)

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Steve <[email protected]<
mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote:
Hey guys,

If everyone is ready, I was hoping you guys could tag your repos 1.2.0. I
can package it up and ship it today.

Cheers,
-Steve

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Brian LeRoux
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>>>
wrote:

I think Brian is referring to a phonegap release from Nitobi, not a
Callback release from the Incubator. Sort of "flush the queue" kind of
stuff before starting to work 100% within the ASF. Is that the case?


precisely so



--
-Steve Gill
Nitobi Software
www.nitobi.com<http://www.nitobi.com>
http://twitter.com/#!/stevesgill

Reply via email to