GitHub is a very easy way to host Git, and it does have some benefits over a plain Git. I read Brian's comment as one of "keep things as they are while we figure out the final solution", but... Brian?
- eduard/o On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com>wrote: > On 17 November 2011 15:01, eduardo pelegri-llopart <pele...@calterra.com> > wrote: > > Are we mixing up the arguments for GitHub with those for Git? I mostly > > read arguments for Git, with a "GitHub is a convenience". That's > certainly > > how I feel. > > Originally I thought we were talking about Git, but Brian said "It > should remain on Github beyond the interim and we should merge code > from there appropriately." > > So I'm not sure anymore. > > Ross > > > > > > > > - eduard/o > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Ross Gardler < > rgard...@opendirective.com>wrote: > >> > >> > >> It's not the tools I care about. It's the processes. An insistence > >> that GitHub is the only place that this project can build the type of > >> community it wants to is a huge warning sign for me. > >> Ross > >> > > > > > > -- > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > Programme Leader (Open Development) > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >
