On 17 November 2011 15:57, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > Nothing to be concerned about. All healthy discussion. Def not about > Github but rather Git itself. Lets refocus, and take the discussion to > the couch-dev list, see Git as experiment through to fruition as a > sanctioned rcs at ASF.
OK, we can do that. However, be aware that you will be reporting to the board in the first week of December. I want that board report to contain concrete and complete proposals for moving forwards. If that proposal is as currently outlined be aware that I expect pushback. For your proposal to be acceptable you will need to demonstrate a healthy understanding of The Apache Way and Gits place within it. Hopefully that will develop over on couchDB (yes I'm on that list). Ross Ross > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Ross Gardler > <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: >> On 17 November 2011 15:01, eduardo pelegri-llopart <pele...@calterra.com> >> wrote: >>> Are we mixing up the arguments for GitHub with those for Git? I mostly >>> read arguments for Git, with a "GitHub is a convenience". That's certainly >>> how I feel. >> >> Originally I thought we were talking about Git, but Brian said "It >> should remain on Github beyond the interim and we should merge code >> from there appropriately." >> >> So I'm not sure anymore. >> >> Ross >> >> >> >> >>> >>> - eduard/o >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Ross Gardler >>> <rgard...@opendirective.com>wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> It's not the tools I care about. It's the processes. An insistence >>>> that GitHub is the only place that this project can build the type of >>>> community it wants to is a huge warning sign for me. >>>> Ross >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ross Gardler (@rgardler) >> Programme Leader (Open Development) >> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >> > -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
