Nothing to be concerned about. All healthy discussion. Def not about Github but rather Git itself. Lets refocus, and take the discussion to the couch-dev list, see Git as experiment through to fruition as a sanctioned rcs at ASF.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: > On 17 November 2011 15:01, eduardo pelegri-llopart <pele...@calterra.com> > wrote: >> Are we mixing up the arguments for GitHub with those for Git? I mostly >> read arguments for Git, with a "GitHub is a convenience". That's certainly >> how I feel. > > Originally I thought we were talking about Git, but Brian said "It > should remain on Github beyond the interim and we should merge code > from there appropriately." > > So I'm not sure anymore. > > Ross > > > > >> >> - eduard/o >> >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Ross Gardler >> <rgard...@opendirective.com>wrote: >>> >>> >>> It's not the tools I care about. It's the processes. An insistence >>> that GitHub is the only place that this project can build the type of >>> community it wants to is a huge warning sign for me. >>> Ross >>> >> > > > > -- > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > Programme Leader (Open Development) > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >
