Retagged Android 1.6.0 On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote:
> Docs and JS (re)tagged 1.6.0 > > On 4/10/12 12:37 PM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Simon fixed a File API seek() issue and dropped it into cordova-js (and > >also a test into mobile spec) today. > > > >We've had varying #s of tests passing on Androids before, we generally had > >more tests failing on Android 2.x. Don't think this is too out of line. > > > >DirectoryEntry timing out is a bad test to be failing on. That certainly > >should be looked into. If it's an easy fix then let's get that in. Gord > >and I tested DirectoryEntry on BB7 earlier today and it was fine. > >DirectoryEntry was also passing fine on my Android 4.0.2. > > > >Otherwise, let's tag-n-bag!!!1 Note the issues for 1.7 and move on! > > > >On 4/10/12 12:30 PM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>I don't care about contacts right now, because those are at least failing > >>consistency across the four devices I'm testing. What I do care about is > >>the fact that we're getting inconsistent tests across multiple Android > >>devices. > >> > >>Samsung Galaxy S II (2.3.4): 9 Failures > >>Galaxy Nexus (4.0.2): 9 Failures > >>Motorola RAZR (2.3.5): 17 Failures > >>Samsung Nexus S (2.3.6): 23 Failures > >> > >>All these devices were factory reset before we started testing them, and > >>DirectoryEntry and GeoLocation tests are timing out. I'm OK with tagging > >>this, but this is something that needs to be looked into, and I'm > >>wondering > >>if this is an issue with other platforms as well. > >> > >>Also, I believe Simon mentioned that there was something he fixed in the > >>JS > >>earlier. > >> > >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> It looks like the first contacts.save test fails because the contact > >>> returned in the save success callback is the wrong one. > >>> > >>> Looks like a native Android issue and not a JS issue. > >>> > >>> IMO JS and Docs can be tagged. > >>> > >>> On 4/10/12 11:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> >OK, I'm getting 9 failures on the Samsung Galaxy S II. Testing > >>>appears to > >>> >be completely inconsistent. I'm going to factory reset the Galaxy > >>>Nexus > >>> >and see if I get the same results. > >>> > > >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> > >>>wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> I'm getting the same thing on Gingerbread. The thing is that on my > >>> >>Galaxy > >>> >> Nexus running 4.0.2, I'm only getting 13 failures. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >>> Looks like ICS is having issues with saving a contact, but only a > >>> >>>couple > >>> >>> of the tests are failing in that. The round trip (heavy) test that > >>> >>>saves, > >>> >>> searches, removes, then searches again passes.. So.. Not sure. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On 4/10/12 11:36 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >I'm still testing Android 2.3.6, because that's what most people > >>> >>>have. I > >>> >>> >do think that 21 tests is rather high for us to release, IMO. Why > >>> >>>did it > >>> >>> >jump up like that? > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> >> All manual tests pass with latest js + framework commit on > >>>Android. > >>> >>>21 > >>> >>> >> failed Qunit tests. 4.0.2 Galaxy Nexus. > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> From what I can tell Shaz says iOS is good to go, Jesse says the > >>> >>>same > >>> >>> >>for > >>> >>> >> WP7. I know BB and Android are good. > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> I'm going to tag the JS and update the docs with a 1.6.0 > >>>directory, > >>> >>> then > >>> >>> >> tag the docs. > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> On 4/10/12 11:23 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >We have not committed anything new in cordova-js, we are just > >>> >>>picking > >>> >>> a > >>> >>> >> >new commit to tag to 1.6.0, so assuming all of us have been > >>>working > >>> >>> >>with > >>> >>> >> >the cordova-js master in our platforms, we are not introducing > >>> >>> anything > >>> >>> >> >new. > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> >Every time any cordova developer touches the common code in > >>> >>>cordova-js > >>> >>> >> >that dev should be testing across all platforms. We have to > >>>stop > >>> >>> >>working > >>> >>> >> >in our little native silos; that is not in the spirit of this > >>> >>>project. > >>> >>> >>We > >>> >>> >> >write a cross-platform tool, any of us need to be comfortable > >>> >>>testing > >>> >>> >>on > >>> >>> >> >all supported platforms. > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> >On 4/10/12 11:05 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> >>Sounds good. But if the changes somehow break Android, what > >>> >>>happens? > >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jesse MacFadyen > >>> >>> >> >><[email protected]>wrote: > >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >>> None. > >>> >>> >> >>> Is none the new +1? > >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >>> Cheers, > >>> >>> >> >>> Jesse > >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone5 > >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >>> On 2012-04-10, at 11:00 AM, Shazron <[email protected]> > >>>wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >>> > None > >>> >>> >> >>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> > 2012/4/10 Filip Maj <[email protected]>: > >>> >>> >> >>> >> I was gonna tag it 1.6.0.. Objections? > >>> >>> >> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >>> >> On 4/10/12 10:50 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> > >>>wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Are you going to tag it 1.6.0? or 1.6.0rc3? > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj > >>><[email protected]> > >>> >>> >>wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> .... Already notes in docs. Durrr. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Tag? > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On 4/10/12 10:48 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> AhhhŠ actually Compass is not available in BlackBerry > >>> >>>before > >>> >>> >> >>>7.0.. So > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> that > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> would explain why it's not working on 6.0 :) > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to file an issue for that in JIRA. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to update the docs to note this, and then, > >>>we > >>> >>> >>should be > >>> >>> >> >>> good > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> to > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tag, ya? > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/10/12 10:44 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> > >>>wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 37 failing tests on a Torch running 6.0. The accel > >>> >>>callback > >>> >>> >>test > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but when I run the manual tests for accel they all > >>>check > >>> >>> >>out, so > >>> >>> >> >>>the > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 37 > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> failing tests might be a little blown up. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> The file API looks fine, Drew. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Looks to me like Compass may be a little f'ed. The > >>>manual > >>> >>> >>tests > >>> >>> >> >>>for > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Compass keep returning "[object object]" so there > >>>seems > >>> >>>to > >>> >>> >>be a > >>> >>> >> >>> little > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> mistake in there somewhere. Gord and I are looking > >>>into > >>> >>> that. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> If we resolve the compass issue IMO we're good to > >>>tag. We > >>> >>> >>pass > >>> >>> >> >>>on > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> both a > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 9900 (runs 7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0). > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:31 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> > >>>wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> No worries Jesse. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> I got my hands on an OS6 device so I'll try to > >>> >>>reproduce + > >>> >>> >>fix > >>> >>> >> >>>what > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you're > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> seeing, Drew. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" > >>> >>> >> >>><[email protected]> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in my rush to > >>> >>>have a > >>> >>> >> >>>long > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> weekend. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sorry all. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Jesse > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone5 > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser > >>> >>><[email protected]> > >>> >>> >> >>>wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android. I'll put it > >>> >>>back > >>> >>> >>when > >>> >>> >> >>>we > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> get > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> this > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sorted out! > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew Walters < > >>> >>> >> >>> [email protected]> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm still testing on other versions of BB. > >>>Seeing > >>> >>>some > >>> >>> >>odd > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> behavior > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> all of a sudden in File API on OS 6. Not sure if > >>>it > >>> >>>is > >>> >>> >>my > >>> >>> >> >>>test > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> app > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> or > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> real bug. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian LeRoux > >>> >>> >><[email protected]> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK so I pulled the latest master from > >>>cordova-js > >>> >>>and > >>> >>> >> >>> integrated > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> with > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> latest master for blackberry-webworks. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 tests > >>>failing. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the rest in > >>>1.7. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected] > > > >>> >>> wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree with leaving the RC tags alone. Just > >>>have to > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> remove/retag > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0 > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> IMO > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron" > >>><[email protected]> > >>> >>> >>wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's wait until BB is done and do a tag > >>>reset > >>> >>> >> >>>discussion? > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> with > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> take > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc1 should still be there though I think > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Filip Maj > >>> >>> >> >>><[email protected]> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm in the process of testing the latest BB > >>> >>>code so > >>> >>> >> >>>I'll > >>> >>> >> >>> let > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> guys > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon how we're looking there. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that the last thing need before we're all > >>> >>>good > >>> >>> to > >>> >>> >> >>>tag > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> release? > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon MacDonald" > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should delete all the 1.6.0 > >>>tags. We > >>> >>> >> >>>haven't > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build artifacts from 1.6.0 so there > >>>shouldn't > >>> >>>be a > >>> >>> >> >>>problem > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> that. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I agree with Fil's steps. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simon Mac Donald > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Filip Maj > >>>< > >>> >>> >> >>> [email protected]> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like the general process Joe lays out. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how vendoring-in a tagged > >>> >>>cordova.js > >>> >>> >> >>>file is > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> prone > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> though, Bryce. Is it just the manual > >>>process > >>> >>>of > >>> >>> >> >>>checking > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> out > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tag in > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova-js, building, and copying the file > >>> >>>over > >>> >>> to > >>> >>> >> >>>the > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation? If this is the concern > >>>then > >>> >>> >> >>>certainly, > >>> >>> >> >>> the > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tool > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be set up to do that automatically. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js > >>>was > >>> >>>added > >>> >>> >>4 > >>> >>> >> >>>days > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ago, > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc2 > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure what > >>>happened > >>> >>> >>there. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In light of the tags not being ordered > >>> >>>properly > >>> >>> >>and > >>> >>> >> >>>the > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> file > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> bug > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creeping in, I propose, just for the 1.6.0 > >>> >>> >>release, > >>> >>> >> >>>that > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> we: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the latest > >>>commit > >>> >>> >>(that > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> includes > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek bug fix) - now our tags are at least > >>>in > >>> >>>the > >>> >>> >> >>>right > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> order > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) rebuild, reintegrate into platforms > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) unfortunately, retag the platform > >>> >>> >>implementations > >>> >>> >> >>> 1.6.0 > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If retagging is too unholy then f it, I > >>>say we > >>> >>> tag > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> everything > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> 1.6.1. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curtis" > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <[email protected]> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Joe eluded to, checking cordova-js > >>>into > >>> >>>the > >>> >>> >> >>>various > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories holds up the release. It is > >>> >>>also > >>> >>> >>error > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> prone - > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mention pushing to each repository every > >>>time > >>> >>> >>there > >>> >>> >> >>>is a > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> takes > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time & can get out of of sync. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts on having the release build > >>> >>>script > >>> >>> >> >>>handle > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this? > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> far > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as during normal development and testing, > >>>we > >>> >>>are > >>> >>> >>all > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova.js anyway, and keep current in > >>>our > >>> >>>own > >>> >>> >>ways. > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Simon > >>> >>>MacDonald > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just fixed what seems to be a zero day > >>> >>>bug in > >>> >>> >>our > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> implementation > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FileWriter. If possible it would be good > >>>to > >>> >>>get > >>> >>> >> >>>this > >>> >>> >> >>> bug > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> into > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > >>> >>> >> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
