Sorry, just had to re-tag 1.6.0
2012/4/10 Shazron <[email protected]>: > iOS tests passing (10 failures - insignificant) > iOS tagged 1.6.0 > > 2012/4/10 Filip Maj <[email protected]>: >> Simon fixed a File API seek() issue and dropped it into cordova-js (and >> also a test into mobile spec) today. >> >> We've had varying #s of tests passing on Androids before, we generally had >> more tests failing on Android 2.x. Don't think this is too out of line. >> >> DirectoryEntry timing out is a bad test to be failing on. That certainly >> should be looked into. If it's an easy fix then let's get that in. Gord >> and I tested DirectoryEntry on BB7 earlier today and it was fine. >> DirectoryEntry was also passing fine on my Android 4.0.2. >> >> Otherwise, let's tag-n-bag!!!1 Note the issues for 1.7 and move on! >> >> On 4/10/12 12:30 PM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>I don't care about contacts right now, because those are at least failing >>>consistency across the four devices I'm testing. What I do care about is >>>the fact that we're getting inconsistent tests across multiple Android >>>devices. >>> >>>Samsung Galaxy S II (2.3.4): 9 Failures >>>Galaxy Nexus (4.0.2): 9 Failures >>>Motorola RAZR (2.3.5): 17 Failures >>>Samsung Nexus S (2.3.6): 23 Failures >>> >>>All these devices were factory reset before we started testing them, and >>>DirectoryEntry and GeoLocation tests are timing out. I'm OK with tagging >>>this, but this is something that needs to be looked into, and I'm >>>wondering >>>if this is an issue with other platforms as well. >>> >>>Also, I believe Simon mentioned that there was something he fixed in the >>>JS >>>earlier. >>> >>>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It looks like the first contacts.save test fails because the contact >>>> returned in the save success callback is the wrong one. >>>> >>>> Looks like a native Android issue and not a JS issue. >>>> >>>> IMO JS and Docs can be tagged. >>>> >>>> On 4/10/12 11:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >OK, I'm getting 9 failures on the Samsung Galaxy S II. Testing >>>>appears to >>>> >be completely inconsistent. I'm going to factory reset the Galaxy >>>>Nexus >>>> >and see if I get the same results. >>>> > >>>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> I'm getting the same thing on Gingerbread. The thing is that on my >>>> >>Galaxy >>>> >> Nexus running 4.0.2, I'm only getting 13 failures. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> Looks like ICS is having issues with saving a contact, but only a >>>> >>>couple >>>> >>> of the tests are failing in that. The round trip (heavy) test that >>>> >>>saves, >>>> >>> searches, removes, then searches again passes.. So.. Not sure. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On 4/10/12 11:36 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >I'm still testing Android 2.3.6, because that's what most people >>>> >>>have. I >>>> >>> >do think that 21 tests is rather high for us to release, IMO. Why >>>> >>>did it >>>> >>> >jump up like that? >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> >> All manual tests pass with latest js + framework commit on >>>>Android. >>>> >>>21 >>>> >>> >> failed Qunit tests. 4.0.2 Galaxy Nexus. >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> From what I can tell Shaz says iOS is good to go, Jesse says the >>>> >>>same >>>> >>> >>for >>>> >>> >> WP7. I know BB and Android are good. >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> I'm going to tag the JS and update the docs with a 1.6.0 >>>>directory, >>>> >>> then >>>> >>> >> tag the docs. >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> On 4/10/12 11:23 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >We have not committed anything new in cordova-js, we are just >>>> >>>picking >>>> >>> a >>>> >>> >> >new commit to tag to 1.6.0, so assuming all of us have been >>>>working >>>> >>> >>with >>>> >>> >> >the cordova-js master in our platforms, we are not introducing >>>> >>> anything >>>> >>> >> >new. >>>> >>> >> > >>>> >>> >> >Every time any cordova developer touches the common code in >>>> >>>cordova-js >>>> >>> >> >that dev should be testing across all platforms. We have to stop >>>> >>> >>working >>>> >>> >> >in our little native silos; that is not in the spirit of this >>>> >>>project. >>>> >>> >>We >>>> >>> >> >write a cross-platform tool, any of us need to be comfortable >>>> >>>testing >>>> >>> >>on >>>> >>> >> >all supported platforms. >>>> >>> >> > >>>> >>> >> >On 4/10/12 11:05 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >> > >>>> >>> >> >>Sounds good. But if the changes somehow break Android, what >>>> >>>happens? >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jesse MacFadyen >>>> >>> >> >><[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >>> None. >>>> >>> >> >>> Is none the new +1? >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >>>> >>> >> >>> Jesse >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone5 >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> On 2012-04-10, at 11:00 AM, Shazron <[email protected]> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> > None >>>> >>> >> >>> > >>>> >>> >> >>> > 2012/4/10 Filip Maj <[email protected]>: >>>> >>> >> >>> >> I was gonna tag it 1.6.0.. Objections? >>>> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>> >> On 4/10/12 10:50 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>> Are you going to tag it 1.6.0? or 1.6.0rc3? >>>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj >>>><[email protected]> >>>> >>> >>wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> .... Already notes in docs. Durrr. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Tag? >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On 4/10/12 10:48 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> AhhhŠ actually Compass is not available in BlackBerry >>>> >>>before >>>> >>> >> >>>7.0.. So >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> that >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> would explain why it's not working on 6.0 :) >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to file an issue for that in JIRA. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to update the docs to note this, and then, we >>>> >>> >>should be >>>> >>> >> >>> good >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> to >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tag, ya? >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/10/12 10:44 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 37 failing tests on a Torch running 6.0. The accel >>>> >>>callback >>>> >>> >>test >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but when I run the manual tests for accel they all >>>>check >>>> >>> >>out, so >>>> >>> >> >>>the >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 37 >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> failing tests might be a little blown up. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> The file API looks fine, Drew. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Looks to me like Compass may be a little f'ed. The >>>>manual >>>> >>> >>tests >>>> >>> >> >>>for >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Compass keep returning "[object object]" so there >>>>seems >>>> >>>to >>>> >>> >>be a >>>> >>> >> >>> little >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> mistake in there somewhere. Gord and I are looking >>>>into >>>> >>> that. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> If we resolve the compass issue IMO we're good to >>>>tag. We >>>> >>> >>pass >>>> >>> >> >>>on >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> both a >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 9900 (runs 7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0). >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:31 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> No worries Jesse. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> I got my hands on an OS6 device so I'll try to >>>> >>>reproduce + >>>> >>> >>fix >>>> >>> >> >>>what >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you're >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> seeing, Drew. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" >>>> >>> >> >>><[email protected]> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in my rush to >>>> >>>have a >>>> >>> >> >>>long >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> weekend. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sorry all. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Jesse >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone5 >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser >>>> >>><[email protected]> >>>> >>> >> >>>wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android. I'll put it >>>> >>>back >>>> >>> >>when >>>> >>> >> >>>we >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> get >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> this >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sorted out! >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew Walters < >>>> >>> >> >>> [email protected]> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm still testing on other versions of BB. Seeing >>>> >>>some >>>> >>> >>odd >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> behavior >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> all of a sudden in File API on OS 6. Not sure if >>>>it >>>> >>>is >>>> >>> >>my >>>> >>> >> >>>test >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> app >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> or >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> real bug. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian LeRoux >>>> >>> >><[email protected]> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK so I pulled the latest master from cordova-js >>>> >>>and >>>> >>> >> >>> integrated >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> latest master for blackberry-webworks. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 tests >>>>failing. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the rest in >>>>1.7. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree with leaving the RC tags alone. Just >>>>have to >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> remove/retag >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0 >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> IMO >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron" >>>><[email protected]> >>>> >>> >>wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's wait until BB is done and do a tag reset >>>> >>> >> >>>discussion? >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> with >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> take >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc1 should still be there though I think >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Filip Maj >>>> >>> >> >>><[email protected]> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm in the process of testing the latest BB >>>> >>>code so >>>> >>> >> >>>I'll >>>> >>> >> >>> let >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> guys >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon how we're looking there. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that the last thing need before we're all >>>> >>>good >>>> >>> to >>>> >>> >> >>>tag >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> release? >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon MacDonald" >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should delete all the 1.6.0 >>>>tags. We >>>> >>> >> >>>haven't >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build artifacts from 1.6.0 so there >>>>shouldn't >>>> >>>be a >>>> >>> >> >>>problem >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> that. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I agree with Fil's steps. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simon Mac Donald >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Filip Maj >>>>< >>>> >>> >> >>> [email protected]> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like the general process Joe lays out. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how vendoring-in a tagged >>>> >>>cordova.js >>>> >>> >> >>>file is >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> prone >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> though, Bryce. Is it just the manual >>>>process >>>> >>>of >>>> >>> >> >>>checking >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> out >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tag in >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova-js, building, and copying the file >>>> >>>over >>>> >>> to >>>> >>> >> >>>the >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation? If this is the concern then >>>> >>> >> >>>certainly, >>>> >>> >> >>> the >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tool >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be set up to do that automatically. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js was >>>> >>>added >>>> >>> >>4 >>>> >>> >> >>>days >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ago, >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc2 >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure what >>>>happened >>>> >>> >>there. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In light of the tags not being ordered >>>> >>>properly >>>> >>> >>and >>>> >>> >> >>>the >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> file >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> bug >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creeping in, I propose, just for the 1.6.0 >>>> >>> >>release, >>>> >>> >> >>>that >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> we: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the latest >>>>commit >>>> >>> >>(that >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> includes >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek bug fix) - now our tags are at least >>>>in >>>> >>>the >>>> >>> >> >>>right >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> order >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) rebuild, reintegrate into platforms >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) unfortunately, retag the platform >>>> >>> >>implementations >>>> >>> >> >>> 1.6.0 >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If retagging is too unholy then f it, I >>>>say we >>>> >>> tag >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> everything >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> 1.6.1. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curtis" >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Joe eluded to, checking cordova-js into >>>> >>>the >>>> >>> >> >>>various >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories holds up the release. It is >>>> >>>also >>>> >>> >>error >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> prone - >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mention pushing to each repository every >>>>time >>>> >>> >>there >>>> >>> >> >>>is a >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> takes >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time & can get out of of sync. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts on having the release build >>>> >>>script >>>> >>> >> >>>handle >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this? >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> far >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as during normal development and testing, >>>>we >>>> >>>are >>>> >>> >>all >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova.js anyway, and keep current in our >>>> >>>own >>>> >>> >>ways. >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Simon >>>> >>>MacDonald >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just fixed what seems to be a zero day >>>> >>>bug in >>>> >>> >>our >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> implementation >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FileWriter. If possible it would be good >>>>to >>>> >>>get >>>> >>> >> >>>this >>>> >>> >> >>> bug >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> into >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> > >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >>
