I don't think Automation would have helped. I grabbed the js that was on the cordova-js 1.6 tag, which is apparently broken. The only difference is that a script would have failed and not me. We still need to coordinate releases better.
BTW where was the test that should have failed for seekTo? On Apr 11, 2012 8:16 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <[email protected]> wrote: > I had to retag Android to 1.6.0. The .js file that Joe added into repo did > not have the fix for FileWriter.seek(). > > We really need to make this step part of the packaging of the release. If > we had a script that builds all the deliverables and then we go off and > test them would be better than all of us doing our ad hoc builds. > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Retagged Android 1.6.0 > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Docs and JS (re)tagged 1.6.0 > > > > > > On 4/10/12 12:37 PM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >Simon fixed a File API seek() issue and dropped it into cordova-js > (and > > > >also a test into mobile spec) today. > > > > > > > >We've had varying #s of tests passing on Androids before, we generally > > had > > > >more tests failing on Android 2.x. Don't think this is too out of > line. > > > > > > > >DirectoryEntry timing out is a bad test to be failing on. That > certainly > > > >should be looked into. If it's an easy fix then let's get that in. > Gord > > > >and I tested DirectoryEntry on BB7 earlier today and it was fine. > > > >DirectoryEntry was also passing fine on my Android 4.0.2. > > > > > > > >Otherwise, let's tag-n-bag!!!1 Note the issues for 1.7 and move on! > > > > > > > >On 4/10/12 12:30 PM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>I don't care about contacts right now, because those are at least > > failing > > > >>consistency across the four devices I'm testing. What I do care > about > > is > > > >>the fact that we're getting inconsistent tests across multiple > Android > > > >>devices. > > > >> > > > >>Samsung Galaxy S II (2.3.4): 9 Failures > > > >>Galaxy Nexus (4.0.2): 9 Failures > > > >>Motorola RAZR (2.3.5): 17 Failures > > > >>Samsung Nexus S (2.3.6): 23 Failures > > > >> > > > >>All these devices were factory reset before we started testing them, > > and > > > >>DirectoryEntry and GeoLocation tests are timing out. I'm OK with > > tagging > > > >>this, but this is something that needs to be looked into, and I'm > > > >>wondering > > > >>if this is an issue with other platforms as well. > > > >> > > > >>Also, I believe Simon mentioned that there was something he fixed in > > the > > > >>JS > > > >>earlier. > > > >> > > > >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> It looks like the first contacts.save test fails because the > contact > > > >>> returned in the save success callback is the wrong one. > > > >>> > > > >>> Looks like a native Android issue and not a JS issue. > > > >>> > > > >>> IMO JS and Docs can be tagged. > > > >>> > > > >>> On 4/10/12 11:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> >OK, I'm getting 9 failures on the Samsung Galaxy S II. Testing > > > >>>appears to > > > >>> >be completely inconsistent. I'm going to factory reset the Galaxy > > > >>>Nexus > > > >>> >and see if I get the same results. > > > >>> > > > > >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> > > > >>>wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> I'm getting the same thing on Gingerbread. The thing is that on > > my > > > >>> >>Galaxy > > > >>> >> Nexus running 4.0.2, I'm only getting 13 failures. > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >>> Looks like ICS is having issues with saving a contact, but > only a > > > >>> >>>couple > > > >>> >>> of the tests are failing in that. The round trip (heavy) test > > that > > > >>> >>>saves, > > > >>> >>> searches, removes, then searches again passes.. So.. Not sure. > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> On 4/10/12 11:36 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> >I'm still testing Android 2.3.6, because that's what most > people > > > >>> >>>have. I > > > >>> >>> >do think that 21 tests is rather high for us to release, IMO. > > Why > > > >>> >>>did it > > > >>> >>> >jump up like that? > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> >> All manual tests pass with latest js + framework commit on > > > >>>Android. > > > >>> >>>21 > > > >>> >>> >> failed Qunit tests. 4.0.2 Galaxy Nexus. > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> From what I can tell Shaz says iOS is good to go, Jesse says > > the > > > >>> >>>same > > > >>> >>> >>for > > > >>> >>> >> WP7. I know BB and Android are good. > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> I'm going to tag the JS and update the docs with a 1.6.0 > > > >>>directory, > > > >>> >>> then > > > >>> >>> >> tag the docs. > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> On 4/10/12 11:23 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> >We have not committed anything new in cordova-js, we are > just > > > >>> >>>picking > > > >>> >>> a > > > >>> >>> >> >new commit to tag to 1.6.0, so assuming all of us have been > > > >>>working > > > >>> >>> >>with > > > >>> >>> >> >the cordova-js master in our platforms, we are not > > introducing > > > >>> >>> anything > > > >>> >>> >> >new. > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > >>> >>> >> >Every time any cordova developer touches the common code in > > > >>> >>>cordova-js > > > >>> >>> >> >that dev should be testing across all platforms. We have to > > > >>>stop > > > >>> >>> >>working > > > >>> >>> >> >in our little native silos; that is not in the spirit of > this > > > >>> >>>project. > > > >>> >>> >>We > > > >>> >>> >> >write a cross-platform tool, any of us need to be > comfortable > > > >>> >>>testing > > > >>> >>> >>on > > > >>> >>> >> >all supported platforms. > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > >>> >>> >> >On 4/10/12 11:05 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > >>> >>> >> >>Sounds good. But if the changes somehow break Android, > what > > > >>> >>>happens? > > > >>> >>> >> >> > > > >>> >>> >> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jesse MacFadyen > > > >>> >>> >> >><[email protected]>wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> None. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> Is none the new +1? > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> Cheers, > > > >>> >>> >> >>> Jesse > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone5 > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> On 2012-04-10, at 11:00 AM, Shazron <[email protected]> > > > >>>wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > None > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > 2012/4/10 Filip Maj <[email protected]>: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> I was gonna tag it 1.6.0.. Objections? > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> On 4/10/12 10:50 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected] > > > > > >>>wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Are you going to tag it 1.6.0? or 1.6.0rc3? > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj > > > >>><[email protected]> > > > >>> >>> >>wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> .... Already notes in docs. Durrr. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Tag? > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On 4/10/12 10:48 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> AhhhŠ actually Compass is not available in > > BlackBerry > > > >>> >>>before > > > >>> >>> >> >>>7.0.. So > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> that > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> would explain why it's not working on 6.0 :) > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to file an issue for that in JIRA. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to update the docs to note this, and > then, > > > >>>we > > > >>> >>> >>should be > > > >>> >>> >> >>> good > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> to > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tag, ya? > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/10/12 10:44 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> > > > >>>wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 37 failing tests on a Torch running 6.0. The > accel > > > >>> >>>callback > > > >>> >>> >>test > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but when I run the manual tests for accel they > all > > > >>>check > > > >>> >>> >>out, so > > > >>> >>> >> >>>the > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 37 > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> failing tests might be a little blown up. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> The file API looks fine, Drew. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Looks to me like Compass may be a little f'ed. > The > > > >>>manual > > > >>> >>> >>tests > > > >>> >>> >> >>>for > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Compass keep returning "[object object]" so there > > > >>>seems > > > >>> >>>to > > > >>> >>> >>be a > > > >>> >>> >> >>> little > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> mistake in there somewhere. Gord and I are > looking > > > >>>into > > > >>> >>> that. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> If we resolve the compass issue IMO we're good to > > > >>>tag. We > > > >>> >>> >>pass > > > >>> >>> >> >>>on > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> both a > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 9900 (runs 7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0). > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:31 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> > > > >>>wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> No worries Jesse. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> I got my hands on an OS6 device so I'll try to > > > >>> >>>reproduce + > > > >>> >>> >>fix > > > >>> >>> >> >>>what > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you're > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> seeing, Drew. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" > > > >>> >>> >> >>><[email protected]> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in my > rush > > to > > > >>> >>>have a > > > >>> >>> >> >>>long > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> weekend. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sorry all. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Jesse > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone5 > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser > > > >>> >>><[email protected]> > > > >>> >>> >> >>>wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android. I'll > put > > it > > > >>> >>>back > > > >>> >>> >>when > > > >>> >>> >> >>>we > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> get > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> this > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sorted out! > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew Walters > < > > > >>> >>> >> >>> [email protected]> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm still testing on other versions of BB. > > > >>>Seeing > > > >>> >>>some > > > >>> >>> >>odd > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> behavior > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> all of a sudden in File API on OS 6. Not > sure > > if > > > >>>it > > > >>> >>>is > > > >>> >>> >>my > > > >>> >>> >> >>>test > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> app > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> or > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> real bug. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian > LeRoux > > > >>> >>> >><[email protected]> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK so I pulled the latest master from > > > >>>cordova-js > > > >>> >>>and > > > >>> >>> >> >>> integrated > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> latest master for blackberry-webworks. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 tests > > > >>>failing. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the rest > in > > > >>>1.7. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj" < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >>> >>> wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree with leaving the RC tags alone. Just > > > >>>have to > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> remove/retag > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0 > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> IMO > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron" > > > >>><[email protected]> > > > >>> >>> >>wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's wait until BB is done and do a tag > > > >>>reset > > > >>> >>> >> >>>discussion? > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> with > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> take > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc1 should still be there though I > > think > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Filip > Maj > > > >>> >>> >> >>><[email protected]> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm in the process of testing the latest > > BB > > > >>> >>>code so > > > >>> >>> >> >>>I'll > > > >>> >>> >> >>> let > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> guys > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon how we're looking there. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that the last thing need before we're > > all > > > >>> >>>good > > > >>> >>> to > > > >>> >>> >> >>>tag > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> release? > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon MacDonald" > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should delete all the 1.6.0 > > > >>>tags. We > > > >>> >>> >> >>>haven't > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build artifacts from 1.6.0 so there > > > >>>shouldn't > > > >>> >>>be a > > > >>> >>> >> >>>problem > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> that. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I agree with Fil's steps. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simon Mac Donald > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Filip > > Maj > > > >>>< > > > >>> >>> >> >>> [email protected]> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like the general process Joe lays > out. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how vendoring-in a tagged > > > >>> >>>cordova.js > > > >>> >>> >> >>>file is > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> prone > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> though, Bryce. Is it just the manual > > > >>>process > > > >>> >>>of > > > >>> >>> >> >>>checking > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> out > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tag in > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova-js, building, and copying the > > file > > > >>> >>>over > > > >>> >>> to > > > >>> >>> >> >>>the > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation? If this is the concern > > > >>>then > > > >>> >>> >> >>>certainly, > > > >>> >>> >> >>> the > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tool > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be set up to do that > > automatically. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason 1.6.0 tag in > cordova-js > > > >>>was > > > >>> >>>added > > > >>> >>> >>4 > > > >>> >>> >> >>>days > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ago, > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc2 > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure what > > > >>>happened > > > >>> >>> >>there. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In light of the tags not being ordered > > > >>> >>>properly > > > >>> >>> >>and > > > >>> >>> >> >>>the > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> file > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> bug > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creeping in, I propose, just for the > > 1.6.0 > > > >>> >>> >>release, > > > >>> >>> >> >>>that > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> we: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in > > cordova-js. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the > latest > > > >>>commit > > > >>> >>> >>(that > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> includes > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek bug fix) - now our tags are at > > least > > > >>>in > > > >>> >>>the > > > >>> >>> >> >>>right > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> order > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) rebuild, reintegrate into platforms > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) unfortunately, retag the platform > > > >>> >>> >>implementations > > > >>> >>> >> >>> 1.6.0 > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If retagging is too unholy then f it, > I > > > >>>say we > > > >>> >>> tag > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> everything > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> 1.6.1. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curtis" > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <[email protected]> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Joe eluded to, checking cordova-js > > > >>>into > > > >>> >>>the > > > >>> >>> >> >>>various > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories holds up the release. > It > > is > > > >>> >>>also > > > >>> >>> >>error > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> prone - > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mention pushing to each repository > > every > > > >>>time > > > >>> >>> >>there > > > >>> >>> >> >>>is a > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> takes > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time & can get out of of > sync. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts on having the release > > build > > > >>> >>>script > > > >>> >>> >> >>>handle > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this? > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> far > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as during normal development and > > testing, > > > >>>we > > > >>> >>>are > > > >>> >>> >>all > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova.js anyway, and keep current > in > > > >>>our > > > >>> >>>own > > > >>> >>> >>ways. > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, > Simon > > > >>> >>>MacDonald > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just fixed what seems to be a zero > > day > > > >>> >>>bug in > > > >>> >>> >>our > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> implementation > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FileWriter. If possible it would be > > good > > > >>>to > > > >>> >>>get > > > >>> >>> >> >>>this > > > >>> >>> >> >>> bug > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> into > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
