Sigh - user reported iOS bug http://groups.google.com/group/phonegap/browse_thread/thread/faad0af97dec8907 (you know who you are ;)
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > Saweet! Nice work Anis. That kills off a bunch of old issues in JIRA too. > > Way to hunker down all. As Jesse pointed out to me, we did 45 emails in > two hours haha > > On 4/12/12 5:00 PM, "Anis KADRI" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork, LICENSE/NOTICE >>files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I fixed >>all the bugs I sawS >> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Android is tagged. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Done >>> > >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that. >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear any >>> > > > complaints. >>> > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordova-js tag >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go ahead and >>>tag >>> > JS >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse - he has commits to cordova-js >>> > coming, >>> > > > > >once those are in we can re-tag cordova-js to 1.6.1 >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel* >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser >>><[email protected]> >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it does modify the >>> > history. >>> > > > We >>> > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it instead, since that >>> > would >>> > > be >>> > > > > >>>more >>> > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in and say "don't do >>> this >>> > > next >>> > > > > >>> time". I'm not that invested in it. >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordova-js (somehow), it >>> > should >>> > > be >>> > > > > >>>> fine. cordova-ios 1.6.1 will then just be the same as >>>1.6.0. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new commit that changed the >>> common >>> > js >>> > > > > >>>>API, and >>> > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure this one thing >>>out >>> > for >>> > > > > >>>>1.7? >>> > > > > >>>> > >>> > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but I am under the impression >>> that >>> > > iOS >>> > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said I'm quite confused. >>> > > > > >>>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordova-js commits to add to 1.6.1? >>> Although >>> > > > > >>>>nothing >>> > > > > >>>> that >>> > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what is built for wp7. ( ie, >>>all >>> in >>> > > my >>> > > > > >>>> platform >>> > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder ) >>> > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >>> > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged the JS 1.6.1 too early >>> > anyways.. >>> > > > > >>>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron >>><[email protected] >>> > >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> No - it's about a user's contribution being noted (it >>> > > exists), I >>> > > > > >>>>will >>> > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common code post-1.6.1 (I >>>acknowledge >>> my >>> > > > > >>>>mistake in >>> > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first place). Can we branch off >>>1.6.0 >>> > then >>> > > > > >>>> >>> cherry-pick Fil's latest fix for 1.6.1? >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joe Bowser < >>> > > [email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>>wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing that we leave the thing in >>>the >>> > > common >>> > > > > >>>>JS, >>> > > > > >>>> even >>> > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed to be there. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Shazron < >>> > [email protected] >>> > > > >>> > > > > >>>>wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing lose that commit? Then, no. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser < >>> > > > [email protected] >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we just rebase the head, push this out and >>> get >>> > > this >>> > > > > >>>> >>>rolling? >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj < >>> > > [email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>>wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like >>>allow >>> > edit >>> > > > and >>> > > > > >>>>those >>> > > > > >>>> >>> ones) >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left >>>them >>> in >>> > > > there >>> > > > > >>>>as we >>> > > > > >>>> >>> didn't >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want to remove without deprecation. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you can deal with the iOS issue without >>>needing >>> an >>> > > API >>> > > > > >>>> >>>extension: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> then >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs >>>need to >>> > > > > >>>>updated too. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending and changing the public API is a long >>>and >>> > > > > >>>>difficult >>> > > > > >>>> >>>process >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and will only get tougher with every platform >>>we >>> > add >>> > > > > >>>>support >>> > > > > >>>> >>>to. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS >>> > parameters >>> > > > > >>>>ones >>> > > > > >>>> that >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't >>>know >>> > how >>> > > we >>> > > > > >>>>merge >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking >>>those >>> out >>> > > > will >>> > > > > >>>>break >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation is >>>the >>> > way >>> > > > to >>> > > > > >>>>go as >>> > > > > >>>> >>>per >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>>http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy . >>> > We >>> > > > can >>> > > > > >>>> remove >>> > > > > >>>> >>> this >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in >>> > somehow. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser >>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't >>>belong >>> > in >>> > > > the >>> > > > > >>>> common >>> > > > > >>>> >>> API. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole >>>point >>> of >>> > > > > >>>>cordova-js >>> > > > > >>>> >>>is >>> > > > > >>>> >>> so >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> it's common. It'd look pretty screwed up to >>>add >>> > this >>> > > > to >>> > > > > >>>>the >>> > > > > >>>> >>>docs, >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron >>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj >>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > so what's the point of this new parameter? >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" < >>> > [email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>>wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the >>>cordova-js? I >>> > can >>> > > > > >>>>branch >>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 >>> > > > > >>>> >>> and >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1 >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj >>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs >>>for >>> > this. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Shaz can you comment? >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" < >>> > > > [email protected] >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like >>> it's >>> > > > > >>>>intended >>> > > > > >>>> >>>for >>> > > > > >>>> >>> both >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> Android >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be >>>in >>> > > 1.6.1. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip >>>Maj < >>> > > > > >>>> [email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that >>> myself. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param.. >>>sigh. >>> > We >>> > > > > >>>>gotta >>> > > > > >>>> stop >>> > > > > >>>> >>> doing >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that, >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update >>> documentation. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser" >>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param >>> for >>> > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet? I >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >didn't >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip >>> Maj >>> > > > > >>>> >>><[email protected] >>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in >>>the >>> > JS >>> > > > > >>>>should >>> > > > > >>>> >>>work >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>now. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake >>> > tasks >>> > > in >>> > > > > >>>>the >>> > > > > >>>> >>>future >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> and >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>them >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th >>> "async" >>> > > > > >>>>parameter >>> > > > > >>>> to >>> > > > > >>>> >>> the >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task() >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>function >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call >>>complete() >>> > > when >>> > > > > >>>>the >>> > > > > >>>> >>>task is >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> done. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> See >>> > > > > >>>> >>> http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> example. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser" >>> > > > > >>>><[email protected] >>> > > > > >>>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is >>>tagged >>> > > > 1.6.1. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, >>>Anis >>> > > KADRI >>> > > > < >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1 >>> > before >>> > > > > >>>>end of >>> > > > > >>>> >>>day >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> today >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>some >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, >>> > Shazron >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version >>>tag >>> > as >>> > > > > >>>>well in >>> > > > > >>>> >>> jira... >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 >>>PM, >>> > > Shazron >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was >>> > > released, >>> > > > > >>>>I'm >>> > > > > >>>> >>>going >>> > > > > >>>> >>> to >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>"Release" >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and >>>move >>> > > > > >>>>outstanding >>> > > > > >>>> >>> issues to >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0 >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>version >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 >>>PM, >>> > > Filip >>> > > > > >>>>Maj >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too. >>> Since >>> > > > > >>>>adding the >>> > > > > >>>> >>> commit >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default >>> task >>> > > > isn't >>> > > > > >>>> >>>running >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake >>> build" >>> > > and >>> > > > > >>>>"jake >>> > > > > >>>> >>> test" >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> but >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> its >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it >>> out. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, >>>"Shazron" < >>> > > > > >>>> >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging. iOS >>> has a >>> > > few >>> > > > > >>>> commits >>> > > > > >>>> >>> (one >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>in >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for >>> > first >>> > > > > >>>>thing >>> > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>to >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage? >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 >>> PM, >>> > > > > >>>>Steven Gill >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >><[email protected]> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote: >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been >>>discovered >>> in >>> > > > > >>>>Cordova >>> > > > > >>>> >>> Android >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>requires >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>a >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>new >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out >>> the >>> > > bug >>> > > > > >>>>on the >>> > > > > >>>> >>> issue >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>at >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809# >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>co >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809 >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to >>>just >>> > > > > >>>>repackage >>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> with >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>bug >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > we >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know >>>if >>> > > people >>> > > > > >>>>are >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>or >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>not. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also >>>had >>> > some >>> > > > > >>>>major >>> > > > > >>>> >>>issues >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which he >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>has >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>fixed >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> now >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1 >>> release. >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>> > > > > >>>> > >>> > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >
