I am commited and tagged On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote:
> Logic error - no worries, I patched it (going to re-do 1.6.1 iOS) > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did I f that up? > > > > On 4/12/12 5:07 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>Sigh - user reported iOS bug > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/phonegap/browse_thread/thread/faad0af97dec8 > >>907 > >>(you know who you are ;) > >> > >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Saweet! Nice work Anis. That kills off a bunch of old issues in JIRA > >>>too. > >>> > >>> Way to hunker down all. As Jesse pointed out to me, we did 45 emails in > >>> two hours haha > >>> > >>> On 4/12/12 5:00 PM, "Anis KADRI" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>>Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork, > >>>>LICENSE/NOTICE > >>>>files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I > fixed > >>>>all the bugs I sawS > >>>> > >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Android is tagged. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> > >>>>>wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > Done > >>>>> > > >>>>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> > >>>>>wrote: > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that. > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear > >>>>>any > >>>>> > > > complaints. > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> > >>>>>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordova-js tag > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go ahead > >>>>>and > >>>>>tag > >>>>> > JS > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse - he has commits to > cordova-js > >>>>> > coming, > >>>>> > > > > >once those are in we can re-tag cordova-js to 1.6.1 > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron <[email protected] > > > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel* > >>>>> > > > > >> > >>>>> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser > >>>>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > > wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it does modify the > >>>>> > history. > >>>>> > > > We > >>>>> > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it instead, since > >>>>>that > >>>>> > would > >>>>> > > be > >>>>> > > > > >>>more > >>>>> > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in and say "don't > >>>>>do > >>>>> this > >>>>> > > next > >>>>> > > > > >>> time". I'm not that invested in it. > >>>>> > > > > >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron > >>>>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordova-js (somehow), > >>>>>it > >>>>> > should > >>>>> > > be > >>>>> > > > > >>>> fine. cordova-ios 1.6.1 will then just be the same as > >>>>>1.6.0. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip Maj > >>>>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new commit that changed the > >>>>> common > >>>>> > js > >>>>> > > > > >>>>API, and > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure this one > >>>>>thing > >>>>>out > >>>>> > for > >>>>> > > > > >>>>1.7? > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but I am under the > >>>>>impression > >>>>> that > >>>>> > > iOS > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said I'm quite confused. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordova-js commits to add to 1.6.1? > >>>>> Although > >>>>> > > > > >>>>nothing > >>>>> > > > > >>>> that > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what is built for wp7. ( > ie, > >>>>>all > >>>>> in > >>>>> > > my > >>>>> > > > > >>>> platform > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder ) > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged the JS 1.6.1 too early > >>>>> > anyways.. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron > >>>>><[email protected] > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> No - it's about a user's contribution being noted > (it > >>>>> > > exists), I > >>>>> > > > > >>>>will > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common code post-1.6.1 (I > >>>>>acknowledge > >>>>> my > >>>>> > > > > >>>>mistake in > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first place). Can we branch off > >>>>>1.6.0 > >>>>> > then > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> cherry-pick Fil's latest fix for 1.6.1? > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joe Bowser < > >>>>> > > [email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing that we leave the thing in > >>>>>the > >>>>> > > common > >>>>> > > > > >>>>JS, > >>>>> > > > > >>>> even > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed to be there. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Shazron < > >>>>> > [email protected] > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing lose that commit? Then, no. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser < > >>>>> > > > [email protected] > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we just rebase the head, push this out > >>>>>and > >>>>> get > >>>>> > > this > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>rolling? > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj < > >>>>> > > [email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like > >>>>>allow > >>>>> > edit > >>>>> > > > and > >>>>> > > > > >>>>those > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> ones) > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left > >>>>>them > >>>>> in > >>>>> > > > there > >>>>> > > > > >>>>as we > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> didn't > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want to remove without deprecation. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you can deal with the iOS issue without > >>>>>needing > >>>>> an > >>>>> > > API > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>extension: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> then > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs > >>>>>need to > >>>>> > > > > >>>>updated too. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending and changing the public API is a > long > >>>>>and > >>>>> > > > > >>>>difficult > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>process > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and will only get tougher with every > >>>>>platform > >>>>>we > >>>>> > add > >>>>> > > > > >>>>support > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>to. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron" > >>>>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS > >>>>> > parameters > >>>>> > > > > >>>>ones > >>>>> > > > > >>>> that > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't > >>>>>know > >>>>> > how > >>>>> > > we > >>>>> > > > > >>>>merge > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking > >>>>>those > >>>>> out > >>>>> > > > will > >>>>> > > > > >>>>break > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation > >>>>>is > >>>>>the > >>>>> > way > >>>>> > > > to > >>>>> > > > > >>>>go as > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>per > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>>>>http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy . > >>>>> > We > >>>>> > > > can > >>>>> > > > > >>>> remove > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> this > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in > >>>>> > somehow. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser > >>>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't > >>>>>belong > >>>>> > in > >>>>> > > > the > >>>>> > > > > >>>> common > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> API. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole > >>>>>point > >>>>> of > >>>>> > > > > >>>>cordova-js > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>is > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> so > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> it's common. It'd look pretty screwed up > to > >>>>>add > >>>>> > this > >>>>> > > > to > >>>>> > > > > >>>>the > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>docs, > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron > >>>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on > >>>>>iOS > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj > >>>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > so what's the point of this new > >>>>>parameter? > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" < > >>>>> > [email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the > >>>>>cordova-js? I > >>>>> > can > >>>>> > > > > >>>>branch > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> and > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1 > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip > >>>>>Maj > >>>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs > >>>>>for > >>>>> > this. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Shaz can you comment? > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" < > >>>>> > > > [email protected] > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks > >>>>>like > >>>>> it's > >>>>> > > > > >>>>intended > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>for > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> both > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> Android > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should > be > >>>>>in > >>>>> > > 1.6.1. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip > >>>>>Maj < > >>>>> > > > > >>>> [email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that > >>>>> myself. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param.. > >>>>>sigh. > >>>>> > We > >>>>> > > > > >>>>gotta > >>>>> > > > > >>>> stop > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> doing > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that, > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update > >>>>> documentation. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser" > >>>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize > >>>>>param > >>>>> for > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet? I > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >didn't > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, > >>>>>Filip > >>>>> Maj > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>><[email protected] > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task > >>>>>in > >>>>>the > >>>>> > JS > >>>>> > > > > >>>>should > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>work > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>now. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the > >>>>>jake > >>>>> > tasks > >>>>> > > in > >>>>> > > > > >>>>the > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>future > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> and > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>them > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th > >>>>> "async" > >>>>> > > > > >>>>parameter > >>>>> > > > > >>>> to > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> the > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task() > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>function > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call > >>>>>complete() > >>>>> > > when > >>>>> > > > > >>>>the > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>task is > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> done. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> See > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>>>>http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> example. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser" > >>>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected] > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is > >>>>>tagged > >>>>> > > > 1.6.1. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, > >>>>>Anis > >>>>> > > KADRI > >>>>> > > > < > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> [email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to > >>>>>1.6.1 > >>>>> > before > >>>>> > > > > >>>>end of > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>day > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> today > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>some > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 > >>>>>PM, > >>>>> > Shazron > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 > >>>>>version > >>>>>tag > >>>>> > as > >>>>> > > > > >>>>well in > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> jira... > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 > >>>>>PM, > >>>>> > > Shazron > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 > >>>>>was > >>>>> > > released, > >>>>> > > > > >>>>I'm > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>going > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> to > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>"Release" > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and > >>>>>move > >>>>> > > > > >>>>outstanding > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issues to > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0 > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>version > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at > >>>>>2:26 > >>>>>PM, > >>>>> > > Filip > >>>>> > > > > >>>>Maj > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching > too. > >>>>> Since > >>>>> > > > > >>>>adding the > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> commit > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the > >>>>>default > >>>>> task > >>>>> > > > isn't > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>running > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run > "jake > >>>>> build" > >>>>> > > and > >>>>> > > > > >>>>"jake > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> test" > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> but > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> its > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure > >>>>>it > >>>>> out. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, > >>>>>"Shazron" < > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> [email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging. > >>>>>iOS > >>>>> has a > >>>>> > > few > >>>>> > > > > >>>> commits > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> (one > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>in > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim > >>>>>for > >>>>> > first > >>>>> > > > > >>>>thing > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>to > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage? > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at > >>>>>2:17 > >>>>> PM, > >>>>> > > > > >>>>Steven Gill > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >><[email protected]> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote: > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been > >>>>>discovered > >>>>> in > >>>>> > > > > >>>>Cordova > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Android > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>requires > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>a > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>new > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check > >>>>>out > >>>>> the > >>>>> > > bug > >>>>> > > > > >>>>on the > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issue > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>at > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809# > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>co > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809 > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense > to > >>>>>just > >>>>> > > > > >>>>repackage > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> with > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>bug > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > we > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to > know > >>>>>if > >>>>> > > people > >>>>> > > > > >>>>are > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>or > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>not. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada > also > >>>>>had > >>>>> > some > >>>>> > > > > >>>>major > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>issues > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which he > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>has > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>fixed > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> now > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1 > >>>>> release. > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >
