webos tagged 1.6.1
> From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:11:08 -0700 > Subject: Re: 1.6.1 > To: [email protected] > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-496 > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sigh - user reported iOS bug > > http://groups.google.com/group/phonegap/browse_thread/thread/faad0af97dec8907 > > (you know who you are ;) > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Saweet! Nice work Anis. That kills off a bunch of old issues in JIRA too. > >> > >> Way to hunker down all. As Jesse pointed out to me, we did 45 emails in > >> two hours haha > >> > >> On 4/12/12 5:00 PM, "Anis KADRI" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork, LICENSE/NOTICE > >>>files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I fixed > >>>all the bugs I sawS > >>> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Android is tagged. > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Done > >>>> > > >>>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that. > >>>> > > > >>>> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear any > >>>> > > > complaints. > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordova-js tag > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go ahead and > >>>>tag > >>>> > JS > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse - he has commits to cordova-js > >>>> > coming, > >>>> > > > > >once those are in we can re-tag cordova-js to 1.6.1 > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel* > >>>> > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser > >>>><[email protected]> > >>>> > > > wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it does modify the > >>>> > history. > >>>> > > > We > >>>> > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it instead, since that > >>>> > would > >>>> > > be > >>>> > > > > >>>more > >>>> > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in and say "don't do > >>>> this > >>>> > > next > >>>> > > > > >>> time". I'm not that invested in it. > >>>> > > > > >>> > >>>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> > >>>> > > wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordova-js (somehow), it > >>>> > should > >>>> > > be > >>>> > > > > >>>> fine. cordova-ios 1.6.1 will then just be the same as > >>>>1.6.0. > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new commit that changed the > >>>> common > >>>> > js > >>>> > > > > >>>>API, and > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure this one thing > >>>>out > >>>> > for > >>>> > > > > >>>>1.7? > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but I am under the impression > >>>> that > >>>> > > iOS > >>>> > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said I'm quite confused. > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordova-js commits to add to 1.6.1? > >>>> Although > >>>> > > > > >>>>nothing > >>>> > > > > >>>> that > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what is built for wp7. ( ie, > >>>>all > >>>> in > >>>> > > my > >>>> > > > > >>>> platform > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder ) > >>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged the JS 1.6.1 too early > >>>> > anyways.. > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron > >>>><[email protected] > >>>> > > >>>> > > > wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> No - it's about a user's contribution being noted (it > >>>> > > exists), I > >>>> > > > > >>>>will > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common code post-1.6.1 (I > >>>>acknowledge > >>>> my > >>>> > > > > >>>>mistake in > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first place). Can we branch off > >>>>1.6.0 > >>>> > then > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> cherry-pick Fil's latest fix for 1.6.1? > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joe Bowser < > >>>> > > [email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing that we leave the thing in > >>>>the > >>>> > > common > >>>> > > > > >>>>JS, > >>>> > > > > >>>> even > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed to be there. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Shazron < > >>>> > [email protected] > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing lose that commit? Then, no. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser < > >>>> > > > [email protected] > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we just rebase the head, push this out and > >>>> get > >>>> > > this > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>rolling? > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj < > >>>> > > [email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like > >>>>allow > >>>> > edit > >>>> > > > and > >>>> > > > > >>>>those > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> ones) > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left > >>>>them > >>>> in > >>>> > > > there > >>>> > > > > >>>>as we > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> didn't > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want to remove without deprecation. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you can deal with the iOS issue without > >>>>needing > >>>> an > >>>> > > API > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>extension: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> then > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs > >>>>need to > >>>> > > > > >>>>updated too. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending and changing the public API is a long > >>>>and > >>>> > > > > >>>>difficult > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>process > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and will only get tougher with every platform > >>>>we > >>>> > add > >>>> > > > > >>>>support > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>to. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> > >>>> > > wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS > >>>> > parameters > >>>> > > > > >>>>ones > >>>> > > > > >>>> that > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't > >>>>know > >>>> > how > >>>> > > we > >>>> > > > > >>>>merge > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking > >>>>those > >>>> out > >>>> > > > will > >>>> > > > > >>>>break > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation is > >>>>the > >>>> > way > >>>> > > > to > >>>> > > > > >>>>go as > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>per > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>>>http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy . > >>>> > We > >>>> > > > can > >>>> > > > > >>>> remove > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> this > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in > >>>> > somehow. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser > >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't > >>>>belong > >>>> > in > >>>> > > > the > >>>> > > > > >>>> common > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> API. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole > >>>>point > >>>> of > >>>> > > > > >>>>cordova-js > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>is > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> so > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> it's common. It'd look pretty screwed up to > >>>>add > >>>> > this > >>>> > > > to > >>>> > > > > >>>>the > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>docs, > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron > >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj > >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > so what's the point of this new parameter? > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" < > >>>> > [email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the > >>>>cordova-js? I > >>>> > can > >>>> > > > > >>>>branch > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> and > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1 > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj > >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs > >>>>for > >>>> > this. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Shaz can you comment? > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" < > >>>> > > > [email protected] > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like > >>>> it's > >>>> > > > > >>>>intended > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>for > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> both > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> Android > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be > >>>>in > >>>> > > 1.6.1. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip > >>>>Maj < > >>>> > > > > >>>> [email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that > >>>> myself. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param.. > >>>>sigh. > >>>> > We > >>>> > > > > >>>>gotta > >>>> > > > > >>>> stop > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> doing > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that, > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update > >>>> documentation. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser" > >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param > >>>> for > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet? I > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >didn't > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip > >>>> Maj > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>><[email protected] > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in > >>>>the > >>>> > JS > >>>> > > > > >>>>should > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>work > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>now. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake > >>>> > tasks > >>>> > > in > >>>> > > > > >>>>the > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>future > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> and > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>them > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th > >>>> "async" > >>>> > > > > >>>>parameter > >>>> > > > > >>>> to > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> the > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task() > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>function > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call > >>>>complete() > >>>> > > when > >>>> > > > > >>>>the > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>task is > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> done. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> See > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> example. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser" > >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected] > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is > >>>>tagged > >>>> > > > 1.6.1. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, > >>>>Anis > >>>> > > KADRI > >>>> > > > < > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> [email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1 > >>>> > before > >>>> > > > > >>>>end of > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>day > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> today > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>some > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, > >>>> > Shazron > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version > >>>>tag > >>>> > as > >>>> > > > > >>>>well in > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> jira... > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 > >>>>PM, > >>>> > > Shazron > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was > >>>> > > released, > >>>> > > > > >>>>I'm > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>going > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> to > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>"Release" > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and > >>>>move > >>>> > > > > >>>>outstanding > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issues to > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0 > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>version > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 > >>>>PM, > >>>> > > Filip > >>>> > > > > >>>>Maj > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too. > >>>> Since > >>>> > > > > >>>>adding the > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> commit > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default > >>>> task > >>>> > > > isn't > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>running > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake > >>>> build" > >>>> > > and > >>>> > > > > >>>>"jake > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> test" > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> but > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> its > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it > >>>> out. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, > >>>>"Shazron" < > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> [email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging. iOS > >>>> has a > >>>> > > few > >>>> > > > > >>>> commits > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> (one > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>in > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for > >>>> > first > >>>> > > > > >>>>thing > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>to > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage? > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 > >>>> PM, > >>>> > > > > >>>>Steven Gill > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >><[email protected]> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been > >>>>discovered > >>>> in > >>>> > > > > >>>>Cordova > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Android > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>requires > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>a > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>new > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out > >>>> the > >>>> > > bug > >>>> > > > > >>>>on the > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issue > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>at > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809# > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>co > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809 > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to > >>>>just > >>>> > > > > >>>>repackage > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> with > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>bug > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > we > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know > >>>>if > >>>> > > people > >>>> > > > > >>>>are > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>or > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>not. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also > >>>>had > >>>> > some > >>>> > > > > >>>>major > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>issues > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which he > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>has > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>fixed > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> now > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1 > >>>> release. > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>
