When we decide to roll 2.1.1, we should use JIRA to track the release. Unfortunately, that means JIRA spam...
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > iOS folks: are there any commits needed newer than the 2.1.0 tag in the JS > for any critical fixes? > > On 9/27/12 3:40 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Just iOS afaik > > > >Cheers, > > Jesse > > > >Sent from my iPhone6 > > > >On 2012-09-27, at 3:36 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> So which platforms are we fixing horrible bugs for in 2.1.1? WP7 + iOS? > >> > >> Basically: do any of the failing platforms that _require_ fixes need any > >> JS fixes? > >> > >> On 9/27/12 3:32 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Where / When are we tagging cordova-js ? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Jesse MacFadyen > >>> <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Not disagreeing. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Jesse > >>>> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >>>> > >>>> On 2012-09-27, at 2:31 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> One click builds are not just for CI! Hand rolling always error > >>>>>prone, > >>>>> and > >>>>> time consuming repatative business like that is a job for a robot. > >>>>>You > >>>>> then > >>>>> can focus on code, and others can see (and therefor improve upon) > >>>>> release > >>>>> packaging. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regardless of all those benefits we want to get to a CI future. > >>>>> > >>>>> (recommended reading on this, and more: > >>>>> http://pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer) > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012, Jesse MacFadyen wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I agree in a continuous integration scenario that makes sense, but > >>>>>>we > >>>>>> are not there yet, and probably not soon either. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Jesse > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:46 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ya lets not ship a release with different ver numbers inside > >>>>>>>bundled. > >>>>>>> That's askin for (more) issue tracking hell. A release tag is just > >>>>>>>a > >>>>>>> one > >>>>>>> liner / automated. If it isn't: it should be. :p > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Filip Maj wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Link fail! > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1531 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 12:22 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Address which for windows phone? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>> Jesse > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:01 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> O ya and we should possibly address this for windows phone 7 > >>>>>>>>>>2.1.1 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Jesse are there any instructions anywhere on how to put together > >>>>>>>>>> those > >>>>>>>>>> starter packages? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I think we should allow some latitude in the point releases to > >>>>>>>>>>> avoid > >>>>>>>>>>> the cascade of meaningless tags, and extra work. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Can we release 2.1.1 and just say that it contains 2.1.1 for > >>>>>>>>>>>iOS > >>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.0 for the rest? There are no API changes right? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>> Jesse > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 9:54 AM, Michael Brooks > >>>>>>>>>>> <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> As Becky mentioned, there's some big issues for iOS and our > >>>>>>>>>>>> user's > >>>>>>>>>>>> would > >>>>>>>>>>>> really like to see a quick patch. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be in favour of tagging 2.1.1, where iOS tags master and > >>>>>>>>>>>> every > >>>>>>>>>>>> other > >>>>>>>>>>>> platform tags 2.1.1 on the same commit as 2.1.0. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather we point 2.1.1 at the 2.1 tag as suggested for > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Android, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> continue work on 2.2 as planned, and ship a fresh release for > >>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein the big showstopper type problems exist. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Joe Bowser > >>>>>>>>>>>>><bows...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should just start cutting a 2.2.0 release. This > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> log > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks too big for a point release and there's enough > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merit > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That being said, Cordova 2.1.0 still isn't officially out, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> complicates things. Any word on that? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 26, 2012 6:33 AM, "Andrew Grieve" > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <agri...@chromium.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another breakage that has been coming up a lot is that the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new > >>>>>> XHR > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't work on non file:/// hosted paged. It's fixed now, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so > >>>>>> would > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>> good > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get it out ther > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> @purplecabbage > >>> risingj.com > >> > >