Nevermind, I'm not able to repro the report.

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote:

> someone just reported an issue with FileWriter on ios6 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1559) similar to a FileReader
> issue I fixed a few weeks back.  Fix is likely easy, just taking a look
> right now to confirm and see if any other things need fixing.  Should be
> solved today.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>wrote:
>
>> The main fixes we'll need are:
>>
>> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console methods to original
>> console commit
>> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console methods to original
>> console commit
>> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Change default bridge from XHR_NO_PAYLOAD
>> to... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Attempt to fix a crash in iOS XHR bridge
>> mode. commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Fix XHR exec bridge not working for
>> non-file... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapsho
>>
>> However, there were also extra params added to FileTransfer that will also
>> need to be included to avoid a JS/Native mismatch.
>>
>> There looks to be some Globalization plugin JS commits as well, but I
>> haven't followed whether those will cause issues if left out.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Brooks <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > When we decide to roll 2.1.1, we should use JIRA to track the release.
>> > Unfortunately, that means JIRA spam...
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > iOS folks: are there any commits needed newer than the 2.1.0 tag in
>> the
>> > JS
>> > > for any critical fixes?
>> > >
>> > > On 9/27/12 3:40 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >Just iOS afaik
>> > > >
>> > > >Cheers,
>> > > >  Jesse
>> > > >
>> > > >Sent from my iPhone6
>> > > >
>> > > >On 2012-09-27, at 3:36 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> So which platforms are we fixing horrible bugs for in 2.1.1? WP7 +
>> > iOS?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Basically: do any of the failing platforms that _require_ fixes
>> need
>> > any
>> > > >> JS fixes?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 9/27/12 3:32 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> Where / When are we tagging cordova-js ?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Jesse MacFadyen
>> > > >>> <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >>>> Not disagreeing.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Cheers,
>> > > >>>>  Jesse
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On 2012-09-27, at 2:31 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>> One click builds are not just for CI! Hand rolling always error
>> > > >>>>>prone,
>> > > >>>>> and
>> > > >>>>> time consuming repatative business like that is a job for a
>> robot.
>> > > >>>>>You
>> > > >>>>> then
>> > > >>>>> can focus on code, and others can see (and therefor improve
>> upon)
>> > > >>>>> release
>> > > >>>>> packaging.
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Regardless of all those benefits we want to get to a CI future.
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> (recommended reading on this, and more:
>> > > >>>>> http://pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer)
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012, Jesse MacFadyen wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> I agree in a continuous integration scenario that makes sense,
>> but
>> > > >>>>>>we
>> > > >>>>>> are not there yet, and probably not soon either.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Cheers,
>> > > >>>>>> Jesse
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:46 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Ya lets not ship a release with different ver numbers inside
>> > > >>>>>>>bundled.
>> > > >>>>>>> That's askin for (more) issue tracking hell. A release tag is
>> > just
>> > > >>>>>>>a
>> > > >>>>>>> one
>> > > >>>>>>> liner / automated. If it isn't: it should be. :p
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Filip Maj wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> Link fail!
>> > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1531
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 12:22 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <
>> purplecabb...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Address which for windows phone?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Jesse
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:01 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> O ya and we should possibly address this for windows phone
>> 7
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>2.1.1
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jesse are there any instructions anywhere on how to put
>> > together
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> those
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> starter packages?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <
>> > purplecabb...@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think we should allow some latitude in the point
>> releases
>> > to
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> avoid
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the cascade of meaningless tags, and extra work.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Can we release 2.1.1 and just say that it contains 2.1.1
>> for
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>iOS
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.0 for the rest? There are no API changes right?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jesse
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 9:54 AM, Michael Brooks
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As Becky mentioned, there's some big issues for iOS and
>> our
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> user's
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> really like to see a quick patch.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be in favour of tagging 2.1.1, where iOS tags master
>> and
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> every
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> other
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> platform tags 2.1.1 on the same commit as 2.1.0.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Brian LeRoux <
>> b...@brian.io>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather we point 2.1.1 at the 2.1 tag as suggested
>> for
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Android,
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> continue work on 2.2 as planned, and ship a fresh
>> release
>> > for
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein the big showstopper type problems exist.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Joe Bowser
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>><bows...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should just start cutting a 2.2.0 release.
>> >  This
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> log
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks too big for a point release and there's enough
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements
>> > > >>>>>> to
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merit
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That being said, Cordova 2.1.0 still isn't officially
>> out,
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> complicates things.  Any word on that?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 26, 2012 6:33 AM, "Andrew Grieve"
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <agri...@chromium.org>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another breakage that has been coming up a lot is that
>> > the
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>> > > >>>>>> XHR
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't work on non file:/// hosted paged. It's fixed
>> now,
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so
>> > > >>>>>> would
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get it out ther
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> --
>> > > >>> @purplecabbage
>> > > >>> risingj.com
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to