>
> Richard Hart wrote:
With just 4 couples left, I've
> > sometimes called a quad becket with some success.
> >
>
> These would be double progression, no? So couple A dances with couple
> C, then couple D, but never couple B?
>
> Jeff
Actually, no. Most Becketts progress in a clockwise direction. Everyone has
equal opportunity to dance with each of the other couples.
Ron Nelson
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Laur
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Richard Hart
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Colin Hume
- Re: [Callers] Beckets not usually double pr... Richard Hart
- Re: [Callers] Beckets not usually doub... Chris Page
- [Callers] Quadruplet Dance Linda Leslie
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Katy Heine
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Ron Nelson
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Jeff Kaufman
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Jack Mitchell
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Ron Nelson
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Luke Donev
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Ron Nelson
- Re: [Callers] Dance length JD Erskine
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Jeff Kaufman
- Re: [Callers] Dance length mhillegonds
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Clark Baker
- Re: [Callers] Dance length Barbara Groh
- Re: [Callers] Dance length JD Erskine
