I agree with Jo - the new list could not only serve to post new dances - but encourage discussions of the dance and recommend improvements. Many callers may not be interested in beta versions of dances
Mac ________________________________ From: "Mortland, Jo" <[email protected]> To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]> Cc: Shared Weight <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 2:45 PM Subject: Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume I would rather have two lists. Jo Mortland Sent from my iPhone On May 9, 2012, at 2:23 PM, "Chris Weiler (home)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello SW callers, > > I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about > starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all > callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the same > list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the callers > list volume is getting too heavy for some people. > > So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_ > subscribe to a choreography list? > > Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think that > the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided into > two lists to increase the signal to noise ratio? > > Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's > just lurking. > > Chris Weiler > Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator. > Craftsbury, VT > > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list [email protected] http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
