If we are going to post and vet new dances, I am quite certain a separate list would be preferable. Our little caller's group here in Missouri would alone double the word volume of the current list. While the total volume would be the same, I think there would be distinct advantages to having the dances presorted out from the other topics. I would most certainly subscribe to both lists if it were done.
Thanks for all you do Chris! Bob On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Chris Weiler (home) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello SW callers, > > I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about > starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all > callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the same > list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the callers list > volume is getting too heavy for some people. > > So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_ > subscribe to a choreography list? > > Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think that > the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided into two > lists to increase the signal to noise ratio? > > Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's just > lurking. > > Chris Weiler > Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator. > Craftsbury, VT > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Callers mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers> >
