I would subscribe to the new list and would be fine with keeping them together or separate, I don't really care.
I would like to know what the WebContent list is. I'm unfamiliar with that list. On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Laur <[email protected]> wrote: > I echo Bob's sentiment. > > Laurie > West MI > > > --- On Wed, 5/9/12, Bob Green <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Bob Green <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume >> To: "Caller's discussion list" <[email protected]> >> Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 4:16 PM >> If we are going to post and vet new >> dances, I am quite certain a separate >> list would be preferable. Our little caller's group here in >> Missouri would >> alone double the word volume of the current list. While the >> total volume >> would be the same, I think there would be distinct >> advantages to having the >> dances presorted out from the other topics. I would most >> certainly >> subscribe to both lists if it were done. >> >> Thanks for all you do Chris! >> >> Bob >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Chris Weiler (home) < >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello SW callers, >> > >> > I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the >> discussion about >> > starting a new choreography list. My thought is that >> most if not all >> > callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have >> them be the same >> > list? My only answer that I could think of why not is >> if the callers list >> > volume is getting too heavy for some people. >> > >> > So I would like to know is if there are many people who >> would _not_ >> > subscribe to a choreography list? >> > >> > Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? >> If you think that >> > the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have >> it divided into two >> > lists to increase the signal to noise ratio? >> > >> > Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, >> even if it's just >> > lurking. >> > >> > Chris Weiler >> > Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator. >> > Craftsbury, VT >> > >> > >> > ______________________________**_________________ >> > Callers mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Callers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers >> > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
