I thought so but not in the dance I'm using. the formation might assume that. But then again, we know what assume... ~ When I dance, I cannot judge, I cannot hate, I cannot separate myself from life. I can only be joyful and whole, that is why I dance. ~Hans Bos~ ~
>________________________________ > From: Laur <[email protected]> >To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 5:13 PM >Subject: Re: [Callers] formation indifferent/ indecent > > >Actually, in the indifferent formation, are we suggesting that the 2's are now >going down the hall and the 1's are moving up rather than just the distinctive >Lady on the left? > >~ >Laurie >West MI >~ > > >>________________________________ >> From: Laur <[email protected]> >>To: sharedweight <[email protected]> >>Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 5:10 PM >>Subject: [Callers] formation indifferent/ indecent >> >> >>I don't see a difference between the the indecent and the indifferent other >>than in one we ask the ones to be proper and the two's trade places and in >>the other (indifferent) we ask the dancers to from improper then change >>places with their neighbor. >> >>Tom Hinds, are you around for a quick answer? >> >>~ >>Laurie >>~ >>_______________________________________________ >>Callers mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >Callers mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers > > >
