I just consider this "indifferent" to be progressed improper. Progressed improper is just reverse progression indecent.
-Chris Page San Diego On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Laur <[email protected]> wrote: > Aahz > > Indifferent - set up as improper formation, then have neighbors trade places > (ladies on the left) > > Indecent - set up proper, then have 2's trade places > > > ~ > > >>________________________________ >> From: Aahz Maruch <[email protected]> >>To: Laur <[email protected]>; Caller's discussion list >><[email protected]> >>Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 12:20 AM >>Subject: Re: [Callers] formation indifferent/ indecent >> >> >>On Fri, Apr 12, 2013, Laur wrote: >>> >>> I don't see a difference between the the indecent and the indifferent >>> other than in one we ask the ones to be proper and the two's trade >>> places and in the other (indifferent) we ask the dancers to from >>> improper then change places with their neighbor. >>> >>> Tom Hinds, are you around for a quick answer? >> >>Could you provide a bit more context? I've got no clue what you're >>talking about. >>-- >>Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ >> <*> <*> <*> >>Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
