Not sure if anyone mentioned the 5 person dance called either Hot Tub Rag, or 
Jack Turn Back, or sometimes Cottontail Rag. It's by Steve Schnur and you can 
find instructions for it here:
http://www.library.unh.edu/special/forms/rpdlw/syllabus2012.pdf#page=15b

Martha


On Mar 3, 2014, at 9:00 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> Send Callers mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: three couples or less (Sue Robishaw)
>   2. Re: Three Couples or Less Dances (Jacob Nancy Bloom)
>   3. Re: three couples or less (Yoyo Zhou)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 21:33:09 -0500
> From: Sue Robishaw <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Callers] three couples or less
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> <snip> In the B2 of the dance, Microchase you say "Turn Single (spacer if 
> needed.") Is that because there's music left over after the arch and all 
> thru? <snip>
> 
> Yes, I'd simply changed from the Contra Corners in the original to DoSiDos 
> but almost always had time left so ended up adding the TS. I like your 
> arrangement though and look forward to trying it. Even better, it starts with 
> something other than F&B! I just realized I only have one dance in about 50 
> that has arming in it (other than ECD). Don't know why I didn't notice that 
> before. Thanks!
>       Sue
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 21:46:43 -0500
> From: Jacob Nancy Bloom <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Three Couples or Less Dances
> Message-ID:
>       <CAJPS8NhT+vUyB+4qZVFtET72EVWJ6gzTKZM=dk2tsbxhdhk...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Hi Rich,
> 
> Ted's Triplet #3 has already been mentioned.  Of Ted's Triplets, it's the
> only one I know of that's suitable for a less-experienced group.
> 
> My dance The Luck of the Morris is in Zesty Contras, in Larry Jennings'
> version.  Here's my version:
> Formation: From a three couple longways set, have ladies #1 and #3 change
> places, and have lady #2 and gent #2 change places with each other, to get
> a circle with each dancer's partner across from them.  Dancers retain their
> numbers throughout the dance.  The dance is not square with the walls of
> the room.
> 
> A1: Couple #1 lead a forward six and back [1]
>       All swing opposite.  End couples end their swing facing the center
> of the set, and the active couples end facing either of the other two
> couples
> A2: Active couple ladies chain with the couple you face
>       Chain back with an extra half turn to face the other couple
> B1: Actives half R&L with the couple they face
>       Actives down center of set and cast off
> B2: Circle 6 to the left
>       All go forward and back
> 
> Repeat with couple two leading the first Forward & Back, then couple three.
> 
> [1] The forward and back is oriented so that the active couple is going
> forward and back to each other, and the other four dancers are going
> forward and back towards someone who is not their partner.
> 
> For two-couple dances, both Billingsdale Pattern by Chip Hendrickson and
> O'Donnell Anew by Tony Saletan are in Zesty Contras.
> 
> General Dummer's Reel (for five), my dance Shira's Seven (for seven), and
> Cornish Six Hand Reel (for six) are three other dances I've found useful.
> They are described in the archives, at:
> 
> http://www.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers/2013-February/005742.html
> 
> Jacob Bloom
> 
> 
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:01:29 -0800 (PST)
>> From: rich sbardella <[email protected]>
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [Callers]
>> 
>> Three Couples or Less Dances
>> Message-ID:
>>        <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>> 
>> Friends,
>> I have a small weekly dance session with seniors in CT and often lack
>> dancers.? If anyone could share dances for 5 or 7 people, or two or three
>> couples, I would?greatly appreciate it.? I often fall back on solo lines
>> similar to the electric slide, or I dance them in squares with a phantom
>> (not too successful).
>> Thanks,
>> Rich Sbardella
>> Stafford, CT
>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:15:07 -0800
> From: Yoyo Zhou <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected], "Caller's discussion list"
>       <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] three couples or less
> Message-ID:
>       <capncxwhznyefyv_c6brrurebkd3gtkwafusgdgfavmna9zw...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Sue Robishaw <[email protected]> wrote:
>> <snip> In the B2 of the dance, Microchase you say "Turn Single (spacer if
>> needed.") Is that because there's music left over after the arch and all
>> thru? <snip>
>> 
>> Yes, I'd simply changed from the Contra Corners in the original to DoSiDos
>> but almost always had time left so ended up adding the TS. I like your
>> arrangement though and look forward to trying it. Even better, it starts
>> with something other than F&B! I just realized I only have one dance in
>> about 50 that has arming in it (other than ECD). Don't know why I didn't
>> notice that before. Thanks!
> 
> I believe the original (Microchasmic) has B1 partner balance and
> swing, B2 all cast off and 1s arch and the rest go through. It looks
> like your variation changes the 16-count balance and swing to an
> 8-count 2-hand turn, which is where the extra time to turn single
> comes from. The cast off and arch ("peel the banana" I've heard it
> called) feels to me like a single figure, so I like it being all in
> one phrase.
> 
> I do like Tom's suggestion; the partner left arm turn flows nicely to
> the first corner.
> 
> Yoyo Zhou
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> 
> 
> End of Callers Digest, Vol 115, Issue 2
> ***************************************

Reply via email to