On Thursday 12 July 2007 08:01:52 am Raymond Chandler wrote: > Hauke Zuehl wrote: > > Hi :) > > > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 01:43:49PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > >> hi > >> > >> There have been talk on IRC of adding yet more stuff to 1.2. Should > >> this be done, or should we freeze the code after stdarg? My opinion > >> is to freeze > > I agree that if we want a real release, we need to freeze at some point > and work on QA for a bit.... > > > I will open a ticket about that but want to say that are some very minor > > bugs may be in code. > > Case in point. > I personally think that the people on the roles list at > http://callweaver.org/roles as quality testers should be doing a large > part of this. I've seen several (and participated in one or two) bug > reports of people saying that something doesn't work for them on one > distro. The response is all too often "well, it works for me on debian > (or gentoo or fedora or whatever)". Problems reported should be taken > seriously and looked into. CtRiX is usually pretty good about trying to > help (provided he has proper debugging info) no matter what distro it is. > > If the people that can help don't start helping, we're going to have a > project that compiles on most systems and runs on some, but only runs > well on a few.
not a dev, but i do agree to that. -- Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
