Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > X-ECN Telecoms-MailScanner-Information: Contact ECN Telecoms > X-ECN Telecoms-MailScanner: Found to be clean > X-ECN Telecoms-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Spam-Status: No > > On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 19:17 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> There's basically nothing to be done. Steve Underwood's SpanDSP does >> everything. All that is needed is the pipe from Asterisk to SpanDSP. >> >> I don't know why someone hasn't written a backport yet to Asterisk. >> I'm still waiting for a final release (had too many trobules with the >> RC and SVN crap) of CallWeaver with T38Gateway for further testing. >> >> T.38 passthru via SIP is working fine in Asterisk 1.4 all you need >> yourself is a Cisco gateway! >> > > T.38 passthrough has never worked for me in any version of asterisk, > to/from any combination of ATAs, t38modem, callweaver and MGCs. > We need to test passthrough more thoughly. We have concentrated on testing T.38 termination and gateway operation, which work pretty well for lots of people now. There are still a few issues to sort out, but the success rate is now fairly high. > For the record, I never got it to work in callweaver either, but I > didn't do as much testing. Is it / should it be any better? > > As for the asterisk bounty, you might as well give up, IIRC Digium has > said they don't want any more T.38 patches because they plan on putting > T.38 into the commercial edition of asterisk.? >
That wouldn't surprise me at all, but have you actually seen that writing somewhere? Steve _______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
