450 was started under Motorola, but that's besides the point. 450i wasn't even being thought about at that time. The original goal of the 450 was for moar better, but let the FSK stay on the network without using twice the spectrum. We all know the 450+FSK combo AP didn't work out so well, but whatever, it's history. The idea was to let you swap your FSK APs with 450 APs using the same channels. CMM3 or CMM4 in use didn't matter, you could keep what you had. Swap APs and migrate customers from FSK to 450 SMs as needed.

Now 5 years later, we're needing more spectral efficiency, better filtering, i.e. more bandwidth, which requires more power. While Cambium was at it, they came up with a way to support at least some legacy pieces (such as the CMM4 w/ a 450i) while moving in the direction of standardized POE which is all supported out of the box, in one piece of hardware. Later at some point, add ieee1588v2 PTP and "Cambium Sync" support for 450i. Yet it'll still work with regular sync-over-power.

Think of how old Canopy is. What, 2001 or 2002? Cambium just stopped updates and support for PMP100 last year. Not to mention finally stopping hardware production... on a 15 year old platform. And we still have 12 year old radios in the air. I still have the first set of 5700BH's we bought in 2003 stashed in the cabinet... I think, last time I looked.

So as I said, and I'm sure you agree, it's nice that Cambium is actually listening to us. Progress. It takes time to change things and phase things out. At least they're moving much faster than Motorola ever did.

On 4/5/2017 8:40 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
450 and 450i are both Cambium

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Apr 5, 2017 9:34 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Motorola?

    At least Cambium is listening with making the Force180, Force200
    and new 450 SMs that won't care about polarity.

    On 4/5/2017 8:20 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
    How in gods green earth did we end up with a confusing power
    pinout scheme for ONE companies products...


    Josh Luthman
    Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2340>
    Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2343>
    1100 Wayne St
    Suite 1337
    Troy, OH 45373

    On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 9:19 PM, George Skorup
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        No, 450 is regular 'ol Canopy. 450i is the same, but 48/56VDC.

        BUT.... 56VDC mode on the CMM4 is wired for the 320 and 430
        APs which is why you need to reverse pins 5 and 7 for a 450i AP.

        The 450i will take either polarity on pair. However, it has
        been pointed out here and a few other places that you MUST
        have -4/5 +7/8 or the radio simply won't see the
        sync-over-power pulse.

        On 4/5/2017 7:33 PM, David Young wrote:
        The 450  Cambium is neither UBNT / Mikrotik nor legacy
        Canopy. A 3rd way. We use the dongles despite the price so
        there will be some clue inside the power injector CMM4 If we
        get the urge to swap some cables to test a port.
        Theoretically makes less smoke.

        David
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        From: Jan Van Kort <mailto:[email protected]>
        Sent: ‎4/‎5/‎2017 5:41 PM
        To: Cambium Networks User Group <mailto:[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: [Cambium-users] smoked it

        Ah, the old Betmax vs VHS routine.  Swapping the pairs won't
        mess up the
        signal?


        On 17-04-05 01:14 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
        > On 3/31/2017 3:03 PM, Steve D wrote:
        >> Ha, their classic POE standard is from the motorola era
        before anyone
        >> was doing POE standards (I'm sure they existed, just
        ignored).
        > There weren't and aren't any POE standards lower than 48v,
        just some
        > de-facto industry standards. At the time in the early
        2000's, there was
        > not an industry de-facto standard for lower voltage;
        Cambium was one of
        > the first with 30v blue negative/brown positive. The rest
        of the
        > industry eventually went with blue positive/brown negative.
        >
        >>
        
http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewPrd.asp?idproduct=2265&idcategory=
        
<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewPrd.asp?idproduct=2265&idcategory=>
        >> might be what you're looking for but it's male to male
        and I'd guess
        >> you'd want male to female.
        > http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/passive/554-poe-xover-s
        <http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/passive/554-poe-xover-s>
        tycon makes a
        > Socket to Plug adapter.
        >
        > You could also easily fabricate one with a hunk of cable,
        a keystone
        > jack, and a plug; just swap the blue and brown pairs on
        one end.
        >

        _______________________________________________
        Cambium-users mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users
        <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users>


        _______________________________________________
        Cambium-users mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users
        <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users>
        _______________________________________________ Cambium-users
        mailing list [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users
<http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users>
    _______________________________________________
    Cambium-users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users
    <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users>
    _______________________________________________ Cambium-users
    mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users
<http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users>
_______________________________________________
Cambium-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users
_______________________________________________
Cambium-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users

Reply via email to