How would you response to the slur, if the victim is your mother, your grand mother, your sister, your daughter, your wife ...?
On Sep 13, 7:36 am, kangaroo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 12, 3:23 pm, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My Letter to Mr. Hem Heng in Washington > > DC.<http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com/2009/09/my-letter-to-mr-hem...> > > Dear > > Mr. Hem Heng, > > > Mr.Hem, your long description is just the excuse, or I can say it is really > > unproductive excuse. Your statement has created only more conflicts among > > our Cambodian people. You should use your own intelligence to surpass other > > CPP's idea on how to rebut criticism in a productive way. > > Can you give us your explanation why you say it as excuses and > unproductive excuses? > Can you tell us why you think that the statement would create more > conflicts? > Can you explain to us why he should use his intellingence to surpass > other CPPs idea since he is representing CPP? > > > I am so impressed with your response to the Tom Lantos > > <http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2009/09/hun-xens-barking-mouthpiece-in.html>Human > > Rights Commission Hearing in the US. > > And why did you disagree or dislike it? > > > Again, all your description, if it was true, it is the outcome from the > > Paris Peace Accord, not from the Vietnamese occupation. But frankly, I do > > accept the truth that Vietnamese occupation has given you and Hun Sen the > > power and wealth today not the nation and Cambodian people. For general > > Cambodians, they has just escaped from the crocodile (KR) but slip into the > > mouth of tiger (Vietnam). Paris Peace Accord on 23 October 1993 has given > > second life for all Cambodians. > > Are you trying to tell us that Cambodia IS NOT better than it used to > be twenty years ago? > Do you still believe that Vietnamese is still occupying Cambodia in > secret as many Cambodians have been saying ? > > > However, the outcome of Paris Peace Accord has been badly evaluated by many > > scholars and observers under the leadership of current Cambodian > > administration. Scholars and observers have cordially described the > > backwardness of democracy development, rampant corruption, human rights > > violation, limited freedom of expression, and killing perpetrators are still > > free of trial (impunity). > > Why are you saying that? > Do you think that the right way for Cambodia is the way that you like? > Is it wrong when it's not the one you like? > > > Mr.Hem, your long description is just the excuse, or I can say it is really > > unproductive excuse. Your statement has created only more conflicts among > > our Cambodian people. You should use your own intelligence to surpass other > > CPP's idea on how to rebut criticism in a productive way. > > Please explain it to us. > All people can say this thing is white. But they need to explain it > why it's white when they don't like it. > Now it's your turn. Can you explain it to us why you said that the > statement is unproductive and excuses? > > > You merely said there thousand NGOs spread entire Cambodia, but you didn't > > elaborate how hurtful those NGOs are struggling inside Cambodia in working > > with the dominate political party. You said there is peace and security in > > Cambodia, but you didn't elaborate that this peace and security is not > > having principle of democracy and the rule of law. So it is different only > > from the Khmer Rouge regime. Or your task as well as CPP's task is to > > develop something better than KR regime only. I am really curious with this > > concept regarding CPP's intelligence. > > So in your mind, everything should go the way those organizations and > people want in their own individual mind? > Americans blasted China about these things twenty years ago. Yet, > China still acted as they had been for a very long time. > Today, China is a great country in their own way. Yet, China is a > great partner with America. > What happened to those accusations? Have they forgotten since China is > a great partner? > > > You said in this world especially in developed countries, the powerful men > > (or leaders) sued their people or others with the verdict of defamation, and > > again, your statement is absolutely wrong and unproductive. You have never > > assured to having our leaders practice tolerance, but you supported the > > intolerance of the leaders. As I know, and many more evidences, your > > statement is not right. In developed countries, the leaders have never > > merely sued their people because of speech and expression. Journalists badly > > criticized their public leaders, only a few cases relating personal and > > social security needed clarification and correction from those journalists. > > My friend, > Look at the cases. Look at the case of Mu. > What happened? > Mu Sued Hun Sen without any ground except hearsay and sentiments. > Then Hun Sen slapped her with the same kind of lawsuit. > Why is it unfair? Mu started it, not Hun Sen. How intelligent is Mu? > Ofcourse she is an intelligent woman. She did it in the act of her > activism. She wanted to demonstate her will against Hun Sen and his > government. It was not that she was a victim of something. She created > this environment. Hun Sen reacted to it with determination to destroy > Mu. With his position, Mu was crushed because she did it without any > ground or foundation except her activism. One cannot win with hearsay > and actimvism. > > > The court in those countries have never taken seriously into any verdict of > > expression if it doesn't physically injure. You are living in the US, have > > you ever opened your eyes and ears to see the truth in the US, if you swear > > or talk bad to someone, the court cannot take that as evidence, but if there > > was scar of injury physically, that could be the acceptable allegation. > > So are you telling us that Cambodia SHOULD BE a country like America? > Please tell us about Mu's story in your own words from your own mind. > I don't see Mu as a victim. Actually, Mu is a political activist, not > a serious politician who wants to lead her people for better future. > Actually, she wants to lead her people to be activist against her own > government. Is that healthy for Cambodia? In my belief, it is not. > Mu's activism leads to seperation and division of the Cambodian > society. It means the same way to Sam Rainsy. All of their activities > are based on activism. They have no intention to unite with their own > people. They want to destroy others for their own indulgement. They > use democracy to hide their ugly truth. They don't have any intention > to help the change to better Cambodia. They want to destroy others so > they can change Cambodia to what they believe it's a democratic > society. That's wrong. They use democracy to hide their ugly truth to > keep the division among Cambodians. > > > Mu Sochua has been publicly twisted by the court in Cambodia under Hun Sen's > > vanguard. You can fool the ignorant, but you can not fool the world who are > > full of fair judgment. > > In Mu's case, it's very clear. It's twisted by any other means. > Intelligent people could see it coming. > Mu started her case without any ground except hearsay and sentiment. > Her lawsuit was dismissed. > How was it twisted? Please tell us. Perhaps we are missing something > here. > I don't think Hun Sen is trying to fool the world. His action is very > clear whether it's good or bad for Cambodia. He didn't twist > anything. > He slapped Mu with a counter suit, which the court took it and > convicted Mu. I don't think that he twisted the case. Perhaps, you are > trying to tell us that you don't like what Hun Sen did to Mu. And you > are trying to tell us that your sentiment whole heartedly go toward > Mu. You are trying to accept her activism. And you are trying to tell > the world that that is the way it ought to be. > That's not how you fight to better something. Unfortunately Mu, her > boss and her party are trying to indulge themselves for power of their > own. That is the truth. > Oh@ You may think that this message is trying to defend Hun Sen and > his actions. My friend, Hun Sen doesn't need any help from anyone. He > has the power today to do anymeans to anyone or anything.Only a foul > would fight him with groundless act like Mu did in her lawsuit. > > > More than this, general Cambodian people are really worrying about the lose > > of Cambodia land to Vietnam who has transformed their imperialism policy > > from ancient technique of using arm force to use political economy instead. > > Evidences from this assertion are numerous. For instance, the uncountable > > unequal treaties and submissive behavior of Hun Sen's administration towards > > Vietnam authority, the non-stop influx of Vietnamese illegal immigrants, the > > land concession and triangle development monitored by Vietnam, privatized > > Angkor Wat and Sukimex gas company owned by original Vietnamese Sok Kong and > > other schemes which are indirectly serving Vietnam's successful domination > > over Cambodia. > > Now it is the Vietnamese thing again. Khmer Rouge fought for the > country against Vietnamese. Yet they killed millions of their own and > brought their nation to ground zero. It took a Vietnamese invasion to > stop it. What kind of society is that? > > Now, some people deosn't like Hun Sen and CPP. Then they label them as > Vietnamese. That's right. Sam Rainsy used it aggressively to persuade > Cambodians to vote for him so he could become a prime minister of > Cambodia. Cambodians didn't buy it. They have been doing it for so > long now. What is it? Now they come out with Mu's action hoping that > they will gain from it. The majority of Cambodians today don't buy it. > They show it clearly in the last election, which was the best election > yet since the fall of Khmer Rouge and the withdrawal of Vietnamese > troops. > Mu and Sam Rainsy party base themselves with activism. That's not a > leadership for Cambodia. They may be material to better society at > time. Today it's nothing more than destruction and division during the > time that Cambodians needs to move themselves out of the pit. > > > > > Among those schemes, the ongoing dispute of > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
