The Cambodian people had been fucking your families for almost four years. They then killed most of them directly or indirectly. Those killers happen to be Cambodians. How do you respond to that?
On Sep 13, 5:43 am, [email protected] wrote: > How would you response to the slur, if the victim is your mother, your > grand mother, your sister, your daughter, your wife ...? > > On Sep 13, 7:36 am, kangaroo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 12, 3:23 pm, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My Letter to Mr. Hem Heng in Washington > > > DC.<http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com/2009/09/my-letter-to-mr-hem...> > > > Dear > > > Mr. Hem Heng, > > > > Mr.Hem, your long description is just the excuse, or I can say it is > > > really > > > unproductive excuse. Your statement has created only more conflicts among > > > our Cambodian people. You should use your own intelligence to surpass > > > other > > > CPP's idea on how to rebut criticism in a productive way. > > > Can you give us your explanation why you say it as excuses and > > unproductive excuses? > > Can you tell us why you think that the statement would create more > > conflicts? > > Can you explain to us why he should use his intellingence to surpass > > other CPPs idea since he is representing CPP? > > > > I am so impressed with your response to the Tom Lantos > > > <http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2009/09/hun-xens-barking-mouthpiece-in.html>Human > > > Rights Commission Hearing in the US. > > > And why did you disagree or dislike it? > > > > Again, all your description, if it was true, it is the outcome from the > > > Paris Peace Accord, not from the Vietnamese occupation. But frankly, I do > > > accept the truth that Vietnamese occupation has given you and Hun Sen the > > > power and wealth today not the nation and Cambodian people. For general > > > Cambodians, they has just escaped from the crocodile (KR) but slip into > > > the > > > mouth of tiger (Vietnam). Paris Peace Accord on 23 October 1993 has given > > > second life for all Cambodians. > > > Are you trying to tell us that Cambodia IS NOT better than it used to > > be twenty years ago? > > Do you still believe that Vietnamese is still occupying Cambodia in > > secret as many Cambodians have been saying ? > > > > However, the outcome of Paris Peace Accord has been badly evaluated by > > > many > > > scholars and observers under the leadership of current Cambodian > > > administration. Scholars and observers have cordially described the > > > backwardness of democracy development, rampant corruption, human rights > > > violation, limited freedom of expression, and killing perpetrators are > > > still > > > free of trial (impunity). > > > Why are you saying that? > > Do you think that the right way for Cambodia is the way that you like? > > Is it wrong when it's not the one you like? > > > > Mr.Hem, your long description is just the excuse, or I can say it is > > > really > > > unproductive excuse. Your statement has created only more conflicts among > > > our Cambodian people. You should use your own intelligence to surpass > > > other > > > CPP's idea on how to rebut criticism in a productive way. > > > Please explain it to us. > > All people can say this thing is white. But they need to explain it > > why it's white when they don't like it. > > Now it's your turn. Can you explain it to us why you said that the > > statement is unproductive and excuses? > > > > You merely said there thousand NGOs spread entire Cambodia, but you didn't > > > elaborate how hurtful those NGOs are struggling inside Cambodia in working > > > with the dominate political party. You said there is peace and security in > > > Cambodia, but you didn't elaborate that this peace and security is not > > > having principle of democracy and the rule of law. So it is different only > > > from the Khmer Rouge regime. Or your task as well as CPP's task is to > > > develop something better than KR regime only. I am really curious with > > > this > > > concept regarding CPP's intelligence. > > > So in your mind, everything should go the way those organizations and > > people want in their own individual mind? > > Americans blasted China about these things twenty years ago. Yet, > > China still acted as they had been for a very long time. > > Today, China is a great country in their own way. Yet, China is a > > great partner with America. > > What happened to those accusations? Have they forgotten since China is > > a great partner? > > > > You said in this world especially in developed countries, the powerful men > > > (or leaders) sued their people or others with the verdict of defamation, > > > and > > > again, your statement is absolutely wrong and unproductive. You have never > > > assured to having our leaders practice tolerance, but you supported the > > > intolerance of the leaders. As I know, and many more evidences, your > > > statement is not right. In developed countries, the leaders have never > > > merely sued their people because of speech and expression. Journalists > > > badly > > > criticized their public leaders, only a few cases relating personal and > > > social security needed clarification and correction from those > > > journalists. > > > My friend, > > Look at the cases. Look at the case of Mu. > > What happened? > > Mu Sued Hun Sen without any ground except hearsay and sentiments. > > Then Hun Sen slapped her with the same kind of lawsuit. > > Why is it unfair? Mu started it, not Hun Sen. How intelligent is Mu? > > Ofcourse she is an intelligent woman. She did it in the act of her > > activism. She wanted to demonstate her will against Hun Sen and his > > government. It was not that she was a victim of something. She created > > this environment. Hun Sen reacted to it with determination to destroy > > Mu. With his position, Mu was crushed because she did it without any > > ground or foundation except her activism. One cannot win with hearsay > > and actimvism. > > > > The court in those countries have never taken seriously into any verdict > > > of > > > expression if it doesn't physically injure. You are living in the US, have > > > you ever opened your eyes and ears to see the truth in the US, if you > > > swear > > > or talk bad to someone, the court cannot take that as evidence, but if > > > there > > > was scar of injury physically, that could be the acceptable allegation. > > > So are you telling us that Cambodia SHOULD BE a country like America? > > Please tell us about Mu's story in your own words from your own mind. > > I don't see Mu as a victim. Actually, Mu is a political activist, not > > a serious politician who wants to lead her people for better future. > > Actually, she wants to lead her people to be activist against her own > > government. Is that healthy for Cambodia? In my belief, it is not. > > Mu's activism leads to seperation and division of the Cambodian > > society. It means the same way to Sam Rainsy. All of their activities > > are based on activism. They have no intention to unite with their own > > people. They want to destroy others for their own indulgement. They > > use democracy to hide their ugly truth. They don't have any intention > > to help the change to better Cambodia. They want to destroy others so > > they can change Cambodia to what they believe it's a democratic > > society. That's wrong. They use democracy to hide their ugly truth to > > keep the division among Cambodians. > > > > Mu Sochua has been publicly twisted by the court in Cambodia under Hun > > > Sen's > > > vanguard. You can fool the ignorant, but you can not fool the world who > > > are > > > full of fair judgment. > > > In Mu's case, it's very clear. It's twisted by any other means. > > Intelligent people could see it coming. > > Mu started her case without any ground except hearsay and sentiment. > > Her lawsuit was dismissed. > > How was it twisted? Please tell us. Perhaps we are missing something > > here. > > I don't think Hun Sen is trying to fool the world. His action is very > > clear whether it's good or bad for Cambodia. He didn't twist > > anything. > > He slapped Mu with a counter suit, which the court took it and > > convicted Mu. I don't think that he twisted the case. Perhaps, you are > > trying to tell us that you don't like what Hun Sen did to Mu. And you > > are trying to tell us that your sentiment whole heartedly go toward > > Mu. You are trying to accept her activism. And you are trying to tell > > the world that that is the way it ought to be. > > That's not how you fight to better something. Unfortunately Mu, her > > boss and her party are trying to indulge themselves for power of their > > own. That is the truth. > > Oh@ You may think that this message is trying to defend Hun Sen and > > his actions. My friend, Hun Sen doesn't need any help from anyone. He > > has the power today to do anymeans to anyone or anything.Only a foul > > would fight him with groundless act like Mu did in her lawsuit. > > > > More than this, general Cambodian people are really worrying about the > > > lose > > > of Cambodia land to Vietnam who has transformed their imperialism policy > > > from ancient technique of using arm force to use political economy > > > instead. > > > Evidences from this assertion are numerous. For instance, the uncountable > > > unequal treaties and submissive behavior of Hun Sen's administration > > > towards > > > Vietnam authority, the non-stop influx of Vietnamese illegal immigrants, > > > the > > > land concession and triangle development monitored by Vietnam, privatized > > > Angkor Wat and Sukimex gas company owned by original Vietnamese Sok Kong > > > and > > > other schemes which are indirectly serving Vietnam's successful domination > > > over Cambodia. > > > Now it is the Vietnamese thing again. Khmer Rouge fought for the > > country against Vietnamese. Yet they killed millions of their own and > > brought their nation to ground zero. It took a Vietnamese invasion to > > stop it. What kind of society is that? > > > Now, some people deosn't like Hun Sen and CPP. Then they label them as > > Vietnamese. That's right. Sam Rainsy used it aggressively to persuade > > Cambodians to vote for him so he could become a prime minister of > > Cambodia. Cambodians didn't buy it. They have been doing it for so > > long now. What is it? Now they come out with Mu's action hoping that > > they will gain from it. The majority of Cambodians today > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
