On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Joe Portale wrote:
> I can provide these numbers for 4x5, 5x7, 8x10 and 11x14. Give me a
> little bit and I'll do that this evening. While we are at it, why not
> setup the table for the whole gamut? Say 2X5, 5x7, 4X10, 7X17, 8x10,
> 11X14, 14x17, 12X20, 16X20 and 20x24.
If you've got these data I'm certainly willing to put them up on our web
page.
> I think a table of rear box sizes would be helpful. In my research, it seems
> that most rear boxes are 13% to 17% larger that the film size. An example
> would be 12 inch rear for an 8X10 in film.
I'm not too sure that the rear box size is a standard though. Film
holders need to be interchangeable, the rear standard only needs to be
consistent with the camera maker's design and/or system. Using a 4x5
reducing back on an 8x10 camera would be an example.
- Wayde
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
_______________________________________________
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers
