Well, the font thing is a subjective thing, but the actual amount of space used by window title bars and the menu bar (since we're on the subject of space) is no different than that of 9. If I recall correctly, they're still twenty-two pixels high. It's the font size that makes it look different, but really, I don't think a smaller size (or a bigger size) would be better as a default setting. (If you want to change it, go ahead, though.)
To play the Devil's advocate, however, I do applaud Apple for hammering in the consistency-across-computers sort of thing. (Even if they're not perfect, either, in cross-application respects.) And that, my friends, was the first un-rant of mine of the year. . . . And speaking of interfaces, what are everyone's thoughts on the OmniWeb 5 preview at Think Secret? -/- Mikey-San "When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading." - Henny Youngman > From: Neil Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Camino List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0600 > To: Camino List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Camino] Menu font size > > Oooooh, yeah. One of my biggest complaints about OS X in general is > that the default (uneditable) font size of almost everything is TOO > BIG. The menubar, contextual menus, etc.: it's all too large, in my > opinion - I really wish Apple would let go and give us the option to > edit the size (and face!) of fonts throughout the OS. _______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
