To quote Mr. Pinkerton from his blog: June 6, 2002
"Chimera's goal is to be simple, clean, and free from fluff and geek-boy features. I phear an imminent invation of geekboys carrying fluffy pillows. It's so easy to just say "yes" to everything, and down that road lies madness and Mozilla's heinously complicated UI. It took me 10 minutes to find a pref in the UI yesterday. The day that Chimera turns into that is the day someone needs to take me out back and put me out of my misery." And there you go. -- Will On 1/8/04 10:14 PM, "Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems people are always suggesting prefs that seem like good ideas > to satisfy the differing needs/wants of different users, but they > always seem to meet a lot of resistence. > > Camino has so few preferences i assumed for some time that as more > functionality appeared, so would more prefs. Hasn't happened and i'm > just wondering why the users aren't given more choices. Aren't many > more things available in the user.js file than appear in the prefs UI? > > I can't imagine some added preferences adding much to bloat/boot-times. > > Why not some prefs for the most divisive features, like the download > manager behavior/appearance? > > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > Camino mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino _______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
