Re: [Camino] Prefrephobia?

[Michael Puskar]

I agree. I love Camino and evangelize it as a great alternative to 
Mozilla. It does lack the GUI for prefs that you have Mozilla, which is 
a mixed blessing for the reasons Mike pointed out in his blog post Will 
quoted earlier in this thread. As a middle ground, I would just like to 
see the about:config functionality of Mozilla implemented. Then the 
geeky/curious experimenter would have access to the most off the 
preferences in a way that is innocuous enough that you never have to 
know about it, but if you do, it is a safe way to manipulate the prefs 
file, i.e. w/o introducing/eliminating any problematic/necesary characters.

What I have done in the past is use Mozilla to set up a prefs file and 
then just copy into my Camino prefs. This also works for certificates, 
when you need to add a cert to your cert db.

Michael

Nate Weaver wrote:

On Friday, Jan 9, 2004, at 07:45 US/Central, Geoff Beier wrote:

On Jan 9, 2004, at 6:02 AM, Nate Weaver wrote:

I really would like a "Camino" with "Mozilla" functionality (though 
just the browser part).


What do you mean by that, exactly? In what way would a "Camino" with 
"Mozilla" functionality differ from Mozilla itself or the stand-alone 
browser component produced by the Mozilla project, firebird?


I mean that I rather enjoy the Cocoa GUI of Camino, instead of the XUL 
GUI of Mozilla and Firebird, and I'd love to be able to use a Gecko 
browser with Cocoa chrome but with more options. Wishful thinking on my 
part, I'm sure, and I'm by no means complaining about the current 
choices I have. I was just thinking out loud; I should really catch 
myself before I hit "send" sometimes.

_______________________________________________
Camino mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino