Yup, realized that just after I sent it! So sorry! I was completely shocked and angry that those boys were granted annonimity. They knew what they were doing when they did those dispicable things to that poor baby, they don't deserve annonimity!
> >I don't mean to be rude, (I'm sure you are sharing it with best of intentions!) but I usually find it a good idea to check this sort of info out before passing it on. > >I searched on www.snopes.com and this is a portion on what I found: > > >"All this is true. And horrifying. Yet even so, there's no point in signing the petition or urging others to. Beyond all the usual arguments against the value of e- >petitions (see our page about the worthlessness of e-petitions <http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/petition/internet.htm>,) one issue specific to this case rules >against the utility of such a plan. >The strongest argument against this e-petition is that the situation being decried is already a done deal. On 8 January 2001, the High Court of England >guaranteed both Venables and Thompson lifelong anonymity plus an unprecedented open-ended injunction barring any publicity about them. Each of these >young men were released i
n June 2001 when they were 18." > > >Again, I'm not trying to be mean!!!!! > >I just know that if it were me I'd want to know. > >Faith > > > > >--- >You are currently subscribed to dec02 as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
You are currently subscribed to dec02 as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
