On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:18:39 -0400, Russell Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So should we really be speaking of Assertion-Driven Development rather > than Test-Driven Development? It would certainly eliminate the need to > warn that it is not about testing. While I understand your point, I think that referring to ADD is a bad idea. ADD implies to me assertions in the code (not in test code). Anyway testing IS part of development. Using a different word just hides the underlying problem. Why are the developers against testing? (I can guess at some of the common reasons, but I'd like to know what this team is thinking) -Steve -- Steve Berczuk | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.berczuk.com SCM Patterns: Effective Teamwork, Practical Integration www.scmpatterns.com To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
