>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dakshinamurthy Karra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, 28 October 2004 2:28 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [XP] Why NOT XP?
>
>
>
>Any other reasons (other than social aspects) where XP might not be
>the right solution? For example, if the requirements are clear like in
>case of re-implementing a standard protocol stack does it make sense
>to have on-site customer?
If you can say that the requirements are clear in the case of reimplementing a
standard protocol, don't you really mean that some of the team understand the protocol
really well - so they are the onsite customers?
Simon A. Crase
Invetech Pty Ltd
Private Bag 44
495 Blackburn Road
Mount Waverley Vic 3149
Phone: 61 3 9211 7933
Mobile: 0431 970 739
Fax: 61 3 9211 7702 (facsimile)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments may be confidential. Any
retransmissions, dissemination or other use of these materials by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If
received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before
opening or using attachments, check them for viruses and defects. Our
liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. [Any
representations or opinions expressed in this e.mail are those of the
individual sender, and not necessarily those of Vision Systems Limited].
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
