On Thursday, October 28, 2004, at 12:27:57 AM, Dakshinamurthy Karra wrote:
> Any other reasons (other than social aspects) where XP might not be
> the right solution? For example, if the requirements are clear like in
> case of re-implementing a standard protocol stack does it make sense
> to have on-site customer?
The customer has many responsibilities on an XP project, including
explaining the stories, choosing the order of implementation based on
business value and team-estimated cost of each story, and definition of the
acceptance tests for that story. All those things must be done by someone,
and it will be better if they are sitting with the team.
Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
You don't want to sell me waterfall.
You want to go home and rethink your life.
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
