May be I took a wrong example. Looks like I often pick wrong examples. My question is "are there any other reasons where XP can't be followed (other than social aspects)? I define XP is as defined in white-book and a team must follow all practices set forth in the book to say they follow XP."
Thanks and Regards KD On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:03:36 -0700, William Pietri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 21:35, Simon Crase wrote: > > > > If you can say that the requirements are clear in the case of > > reimplementing a standard protocol, don't you really mean that some of > > the team understand the protocol really well - so they are the onsite > > customers? > > My fear about a situation like that is the lack of checks and balances. > Do you think it likely that a businessperson and a developer would > choose the same things to implement first, and how thoroughly to do > them? Personally, especially with under-the-hood things like protocols, > I'm very tempted to gold plate; I find the beautiful, complete solution > very seductive. > > William > > > > > To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > -- Dakshinamurthy Karra CTO, Subex Systems Ltd.(http://www.subexsystems.com) To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
