--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stede Troisi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check this article out from Computerworld Online:
>
>
http://www.computerworld.com/managementtopics/management/story/0,1080
1,97224,00.html?SKC=home97224
The article talks about a remaining layer of mgmt that would manage
the development process.
Now, what's to stop this layer of mgmt
from getting outsourced themselves, I mean if it takes such
expertise to manage a software process, how can we afford to have
that inhouse?
>
> Is it really getting this bad? How can XP grow in this
> climate?
XP could thrive in this environment. There would be no need to
outsource a process that was percieved as something easy done in
spare time, in support of "core" duties, whatever those are.
OTOH it would be very justified to outsource a
well-segmented specialized discipline that was seen as rocket
science.
>
> and again, why do we allow this?
When does it stop? When there's only the president left?
-Rich
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
