An A4 piece of paper has a little over 9kb of data storage if storing in binary at 300dpi
— Jenna On Saturday, 14 April 2012 at 1:09 AM, Dave Everitt wrote: > There's a crucial point here... if 3k (the old 4k) is a 'proof of concept' > and a great exercise in programming skill, it isn't something that most users > will really worry about. If the 3k limit has to be broken back up to 4 or > even 5k to get some added/altered/optional functionality that would help > usability for the rest of us, it's not an issue for me - DaveE > > > 3kb is great and all, but it seems kind of dishonest if the framework isn't > > even really usable without a bunch of other gems and files and stuff. The > > conflict between 3/4kb and having robust well designed features often seems > > to haunt this project. Maybe time for a forking? I have next to no interest > > in 3kb as a real feature. > _______________________________________________ > Camping-list mailing list > Camping-list@rubyforge.org (mailto:Camping-list@rubyforge.org) > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list > >
_______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
